The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioeffects Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound Contrast Agents
Open accessAbstract
Diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents have been developed for enhancing the echogenicity of blood and for delineating other structures of the body. Approved agents are suspensions of gas bodies (stabilized microbubbles), which have been designed for persistence in the circulation and strong echo return for imaging. The interaction of ultrasound pulses with these gas bodies is a form of acoustic cavitation, and they also may act as inertial cavitation nuclei. This interaction produces mechanical perturbation and a potential for bioeffects on nearby cells or tissues. In vitro, sonoporation and cell death occur at mechanical index (MI) values less than the inertial cavitation threshold. In vivo, bioeffects reported for MI values greater than 0.4 include microvascular leakage, petechiae, cardiomyocyte death, inflammatory cell infiltration, and premature ventricular contractions and are accompanied by gas body destruction within the capillary bed. Bioeffects for MIs of 1.9 or less have been reported in skeletal muscle, fat, myocardium, kidney, liver, and intestine. Therapeutic applications that rely on these bioeffects include targeted drug delivery to the interstitium and DNA transfer into cells for gene therapy. Bioeffects of contrast-aided diagnostic ultrasound happen on a microscopic scale, and their importance in the clinical setting remains uncertain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Martin, H., Jolesz, F. A., & Vykhodtseva, N. (2003) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00741-x · Cited by 144
Cited by
Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery
Kooiman, K., Vos, H. J., Versluis, M., & de Jong, N. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.003 · Cited by 401
Blood Vessel Deformations on Microsecond Time Scales by Ultrasonic Cavitation
Chen, H., Kreider, W., Brayman, A. A., Bailey, M. R., & Matula, T. J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.034301 · Cited by 314
Self-citationCavitation properties of block copolymer stabilized phase-shift nanoemulsions used as drug carriers
Rapoport, N., Christensen, D. A., Kennedy, A. M., & Nam, K.-H. (2010) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.11.009 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D. L., Averkiou, M. A., Brayman, A. A., Everbach, E. C., Holland, C. K., Wible, J. H., & Wu, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611-632
- ISSN
- 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125922770
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioeffects Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound Contrast Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7863/jum.2008.27.4.611
- The paper
- Miller, D. L., Averkiou, M. A., Brayman, A. A., Everbach, E. C., Holland, C. K., Wible, J. H., & Wu, J. (2008). Bioeffects Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound Contrast Agents. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.4.611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.