The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations
Open accessAbstract
Applications of ultrasound in medicine for therapeutic purposes have been accepted and beneficial uses of ultrasonic biological effects for many years. Low-power ultrasound of about 1 MHz has been widely applied since the 1950s for physical therapy in conditions such as tendinitis and bursitis. In the 1980s, high-pressure-amplitude shock waves came into use for mechanically resolving kidney stones, and "lithotripsy" rapidly replaced surgery as the most frequent treatment choice. The use of ultrasonic energy for therapy continues to expand, and approved applications now include uterine fibroid ablation, cataract removal (phacoemulsification), surgical tissue cutting and hemostasis, transdermal drug delivery, and bone fracture healing, among others. Undesirable bioeffects can occur, including burns from thermal-based therapies and severe hemorrhage from mechanical-based therapies (eg, lithotripsy). In all of these therapeutic applications of ultrasound bioeffects, standardization, ultrasound dosimetry, benefits assurance, and side-effect risk minimization must be carefully considered to ensure an optimal benefit to risk ratio for the patient. Therapeutic ultrasound typically has well-defined benefits and risks and therefore presents a manageable safety problem to the clinician. However, safety information can be scattered, confusing, or subject to commercial conflicts of interest. Of paramount importance for managing this problem is the communication of practical safety information by authoritative groups, such as the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, to the medical ultrasound community. In this overview, the Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine outlines the wide range of therapeutic ultrasound methods, which are in clinical use or under study, and provides general guidance for ensuring therapeutic ultrasound safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy
Zhou, Z., Song, J., Nie, L., & Chen, X. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00271d · Cited by 2,098
Surface acoustic wave microfluidics
Ding, X., Li, P., Lin, S.-C. S., Stratton, Z. S., Nama, N., Guo, F., Slotcavage, D., Mao, X., Shi, J., Costanzo, F., et al. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50361e · Cited by 926
Transcutaneous ultrasound energy harvesting using capacitive triboelectric technology
Hinchet, R., Yoon, H.-J., Ryu, H., Kim, M.-K., Choi, E.-K., Kim, D.-S., & Kim, S.-W. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3997 · Cited by 854
Izadifar, Z., Izadifar, Z., Chapman, D., & Babyn, P. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9020460 · Cited by 457
Skin cancer and new treatment perspectives: A review
Simões, M. C. F., Sousa, J. J. S., & Pais, A. A. C. C. (2015) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.001 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D. L., Smith, N. B., Bailey, M. R., Czarnota, G. J., Hynynen, K., Makin, I. R. S., & Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
- Venue
- Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 623-634
- ISSN
- 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1849681763
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.623
- The paper
- Miller, D. L., Smith, N. B., Bailey, M. R., Czarnota, G. J., Hynynen, K., Makin, I. R. S., & Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. (2012). Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.