Cited by 8Information Technology Governance and StrategySoftware System Performance and ReliabilityReliability and Maintenance Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Case Study on Applying ITIL Availability Management Best Practice

Open access
Zeng, Jihong·2008·Contemporary Management Research

Abstract

This paper presents a case study on how to apply ITIL availability management best practice to assess the end-to-end service availability in a tiered web service delivery environment. It also helps pinpoint the road blocks to the required service level and provide cost-effective solution for improved service delivery. An overview of basic ITIL availability management concept is provided along with the introduction to two key parameters, mean time between failure (MTBF) for reliability and mean time to repair (MTTR) for maintainability. Then a block diagram modeling approach for the overall information system availability assessment is presented. The block diagrams are used to describe the interrelationship among the components or subsystems to define a system model. The ITIL best practice approaches for availability management are discussed in detail in the case study. It demonstrates that the overall service availability is affected by the availability of information systems as well as applications and operational processes. The modeling approach is capable of gaining visibility on root cause of the service availability degradation, identifying risks in the existing information system, and providing support to future application development and infrastructure upgrade for high availability business services. Keywords: Service Availability, Information System Availability, ITIL, Availability Modeling

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7903/cmr.1161

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bowles, J.B., and Dobbins, J. G. (1998). High-Availability Transaction Processing: Practical Experience in Availability Modeling and Analysis. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1(1), 268-273.
  2. Fisher, S. (2000). E-business Redefines Infrastructure Needs. InfoWorld, 22(2), 22.
  3. Hochstein, A., Tamm, G. and Brenner, W. (2005). Service-oriented IT management: Benefit, Cost and Success Factors. Regensburg ,Germany: Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems.
  4. Hoyland, A., and Rausand, M. (1994). System Reliability Theory: Models and Statistics Methods. New York: Wiley.
  5. Leemis, L.M. (1995). Reliability-Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods, Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  6. Nickel, S.J. (1978). The Investment Decisions of Firms. Cambridge: University Press.
  7. Pope, R. H. (1986). Human Performance: What Improvement from Human Reliability Assessment, Reliability Data Collection and Use in Risk and Availability Assessment. In H.J. Wingender (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th EuroData Conference (pp. 455-465). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  8. Potgieter, B. C., Botha, J. H., and Lew, C. (2005). Evidence That Use of the ITIL Framework is Effective. Tauranga, New Zealand: Proceeding of the 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications.
  9. Raghavendra, C. S., and Makam, S. V. (1986). Reliability Modeling and Analysis of Computing Networks.IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 35(2), 156-160.
  10. Van Bon, J. (2002). IT Service Management Guide, Vol. 1, New York: Addison-Wesley.
  11. Zacks, S. (1992). Introduction to Reliability Analysis: Probability Models and Statistics Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Zeng, J.
Affiliations
New York Institute of Technology (CA)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Jihong
Venue
Contemporary Management Research
Published
2008-11-20
Volume
4
Issue
4
ISSN
1813-5498 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146988539
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Contemporary Management Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
Keywords
ITIL, availability management, service availability, mean time between failures, mean time to repair, availability modeling, block diagram modeling, high availability, service level agreements, root cause analysis, IT service management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Case Study on Applying ITIL Availability Management Best Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7903/cmr.1161
The paper
Zeng, J. (2008). A Case Study on Applying ITIL Availability Management Best Practice. Contemporary Management Research. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.1161