The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental safety and living in a smart city
Open accessAbstract
The present study examines the environmental safety and liveability of today's metropolises and cities by discussing the present situation regarding technical sciences, accidents, disasters and waste management, sharing some philosophical thoughts on the future, describing the technical problems, human failures and errors, and finally, by proposing some possible solutions. It is necessary and of upmost importance to address the issues of security, environmental safety and protection, as well as long-term, sustainable liveability of the smart cities of the future by considering the latest technology available today, as proposed in the present study. It outlines some of the guidelines aiming to change human behaviour, the necessity and possibility of ensuring order and eliminating insecurity, chaos and disorder in future smart cities. Furthermore, it wishes to bring attention to the lack and need of scientific research of the elements providing security and liveability of today's cities and metropolises, the absence of which is causing suffering and unbearable living conditions for millions of people. Finally, it proposes an approach of engineering and careful, responsible and forward-looking planning to ensure that people will live in security and dignity in the smart cities of the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“| 1 | Risk Assessment | [26-28] |”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“If associated with technological developments, livability, security, and safety were the three issues related to smart cities [26].”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Safety was added into objectives because this article clearly states that a livable smart city must address security, environmental safety, and protection.”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Aspects of critical infrastructure are also widely found in life support [26,28] and government services [28,29] in smart cities.”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Another security objective identified was safety [26].”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“From 17 pieces of literature, we found that only 1 piece of literature did not discuss smart cities, while 2 pieces of literature discussed livable cities supporting smart cities [26,27].”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Most literature recommends specific safeguards for certain threats so that only one [28,[37][38][39]42] or two security objectives are discussed [26,29,40,41].”
From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Albini, 2018, Procedia Manufacturing, 2, 485, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.074 · DOI
- Butts, 2012, Solutions, 3, 55, 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2012.02204.x · DOI
- Kiss-Leizer, 2018, Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 16, 360, 10.7906/indecs.16.3.8 · DOI
- Kiss-Leizer, 2015, Aeronautics Publications, 27, 17, 10.12968/eyed.2015.17.5.25 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sensuse, D. I., Putro, P. A. W., Rachmawati, R., & Sunindyo, W. D. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13120580 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiss-Leizer, G. K.
- Venue
- Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
- Publisher
- Croatian Interdisciplinary Society
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 360-368
- ISSN
- 1334-4676 (ISSN-L)
- 1334-4684
- OpenAlex
- W3090994882
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Safety and Risk Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Construction Management and Sustainability
- Keywords
- smart cities, environmental safety, urban liveability, urban security, disasters, accidents, waste management, human error, human behaviour change, sustainable urban planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental safety and living in a smart city. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7906/indecs.18.3.5
- The paper
- Kiss-Leizer, G. K. (2020). Environmental safety and living in a smart city. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.18.3.5
