The DOI matches its DataCite record; 81 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intersecting Nations, Diverging Discourses: The Fraught Encounter of Chinese and Tibetan Literatures in the Modern Era
Open accessAbstract
This is a two-pronged study of how the Chinese and Tibetan literary traditions have become intertwined in the modern era. Setting out from the contention that the study of minority literatures in China must be fundamentally multilingual in its approach, this dissertation investigates how Tibetans were written into Chinese literature, and how Tibetans themselves adopted and adapted Chinese literary discourses to their own ends. It begins with Lu Xun and the formative literary conceptions of nation in the late Qing and Republican periods – a time when the Tibetan subject was fundamentally absent from modern Chinese literature – and then moves to the 1980s, when Tibet and Tibetans belatedly, and contentiously, became valid subject matter for Han Chinese writers. The second aspect of the project situates modern Tibetan-language literature, which arose from the 1980s onwards, within the literary and intellectual context of modern China. I read Döndrup Gyel, modern Tibetan literature’s “father figure,” as working within unmistakably Lu Xun-ian paradigms, I consider the contradictions that arose when Tsering Döndrup’s short story “Ralo” was interpreted as a Tibetan equivalent of “The True Story of Ah Q,” and I analyze the rise of a “Tibetan May Fourth Movement” in the 2000s, which I argue presented a selective reading of modern China’s intellectual history. Throughout, I focus on the intersections and divergences at play and examine the ways in which these texts navigate complex and conflicting discourses of nationalism, statism, and colonialism. The conclusions of this research point us toward significant theoretical reconceptualizations of literary practices in the People’s Republic of China, which now include not only a vast body of Chinese-language writing on minority peoples, but also numerous minority-language literatures and distinct “national” literary traditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A number of my interlocutors said they had been influenced by the writings of influential secularist Tibetan essayists like Zhokdung (see Peacock 2020: 248-250).”
From Feeling Apart: Relations of Belonging in Tibetan Buddhist Lay-Monastic Communities (2021) · cites this paper as Peacock 2020
Citations
Cites
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Reid, A. J. S. (1985) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2759245 · Cited by 25,964
Bhabha, H. Κ. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203820551 · Cited by 19,148
Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse
Chatterjee, P. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,336
Hutchins, F. G., & Nandy, A. (1985) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/90.2.475 · Cited by 1,123
Ethnonationalism: A Quest for Understanding
Fukuyama, F., & Connor, W. F. (1994) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045930 · Cited by 904
Schein, L. (2000) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822397311 · Cited by 682
Representing Nationality in China: Refiguring Majority/Minority Identities
Gladney, D. C. (1994) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.2307/2059528 · Cited by 523
The Manchu way: the Eight Banners and ethnic identity in late imperial China
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2340 · Cited by 498
A History of Modern Chinese Fiction
Goodrich, C. S., & Hsia, C. T. (1972) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/600051 · Cited by 345
Gender and Internal Orientalism in China
Schein, L. (1997) · Modern China · doi:10.1177/009770049702300103 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feeling Apart: Relations of Belonging in Tibetan Buddhist Lay-Monastic Communities
Caple, J. (2021) · Numen · doi:10.1163/15685276-12341636 · Cited by 9
Necessary Questions of Chö: Uses and Abuses of Religion in Dondrup Gyel’s “Tulku”
Hartmann, C. (2021) · HIMALAYA · doi:10.2218/himalaya.2021.6600
Metadata
- Authors
- Peacock, C.
- Corresponding author
- Peacock, Christopher
- Venue
- Columbia University
- Publisher
- Columbia University
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W3044793962
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Comparative and World Literature
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Keywords
- modern Chinese literature, Lu Xun, The True Story of Ah Q, nation and literature, nationalism, statism, colonialism, literary translation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersecting Nations, Diverging Discourses: The Fraught Encounter of Chinese and Tibetan Literatures in the Modern Era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7916/d8-m4ej-pe03
- The paper
- Peacock, C. (2020). Intersecting Nations, Diverging Discourses: The Fraught Encounter of Chinese and Tibetan Literatures in the Modern Era. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-m4ej-pe03