Cited by 39Online and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Role Ambiguity in Online Courses: An Analysis of Student and Instructor Expectations

Open access
Bork, Rachel Julia Hare, Rucks-Ahidiana, Zawadi·2013·Columbia University

Abstract

This paper uses data from a qualitative investigation of online courses at two community colleges and a framework of role and socialization theory to examine how expectations about the roles of online student and online instructor differ among students and instructors. The findings suggest that a misalignment of student and instructor expectations of one another’s actions and behaviors leads to role ambiguity in the online context. Role ambiguity tends to cause frustration, confusion, and tension among both students and instructors, as they struggle to understand how their online roles differ from their roles in face-to-face settings. The mutual misalignment of expectations, coupled with a lack of exposure to the typical socialization processes that would be present in a face-to-face course, suggests that colleges need to implement institutional-level interventions, such as student readiness and faculty development activities, to bring online student and instructor expectations into better alignment.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.7916/d8c24tgv

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater student control over the pace of learning in online instruction may pose challenges, particularly for those with limited self-directed learning skills.

    “However, the greater degree of student control over the pace of their learning in online instruction may also pose challenges, particularly for those with limited self-directed learning skills (Bambara et al., 2009;Bork & Rucks-Ahidiana, 2013;Doherty, 2006;Guglielmino & Guglielmino, 2003;Nash, 2005;Rovai, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bork, R. J. H., & Rucks-Ahidiana, Z.
Venue
Columbia University
Publisher
Columbia University
Published
2013
OpenAlex
W1479716377
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
role ambiguity, online courses, student expectations, instructor expectations, community colleges, online learning, student readiness, faculty development, teacher-student relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review