The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
ICMP Traceback Messages
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Survey of network-based defense mechanisms countering the DoS and DDoS problems
Peng, T., Leckie, C., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1216370.1216373 · Cited by 759
Snoeren, A. C., Partridge, C., Sanchez, L. A., Jones, C. E., Tchakountio, F., Kent, S. T., & Strayer, W. T. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383060 · Cited by 733
Distributed denial of service attacks
Lau, F., Rubin, S. H., Smith, M. H., & Trajkovic, L. (2002) · SMC 2000 Conference Proceedings. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 'Cybernetics Evolving to Systems, Humans, Organizations, and their Complex Interactions' (Cat. No.00CH37166) · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2000.886455 · Cited by 582
Implementing Pushback: Router-Based Defense Against DDoS Attacks
Ioannidis, J., & Bellovin, S. M. (2002) · doi:10.7916/d8r78mxv · Cited by 543
Self-citationTechniques for Cyber Attack Attribution
Wheeler, D. A., & Larsen, G. N. (2003) · doi:10.21236/ada468859 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellovin, S. M., Leech, M., & Taylor, T.
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1578138711
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 89.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ICMP Traceback Messages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7916/d8ff406r
- The paper
- Bellovin, S. M., Leech, M., & Taylor, T. (2003). ICMP Traceback Messages. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8ff406r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.