The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Operations management
Open accessAbstract
This text presents both a logical path through the activities of operations management and an understanding of the strategic context in which operations managers work. It features worked examples of techniques discussed in the text. 6th edition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mass customization: Literature review and research directions
Da Silveira, G., Borenstein, D., & Fogliatto, F. S. (2001) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00079-7 · Cited by 1,311
Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis
González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.002 · Cited by 678
Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements
Robinson, S. (2008) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602368 · Cited by 482
Inventory Record Inaccuracy: An Empirical Analysis
DeHoratius, N., & Raman, A. (2008) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0789 · Cited by 432
Circular business models: Business approach as driver or obstructer of sustainability transitions?
Hofmann, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.115 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. B.
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W3142912102
- Cited by
- 1,792
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 479.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operations management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.82444/warw.33661327
- The paper
- Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2010). Operations management. https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33661327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
