The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellulase Production by Bacteria: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Cellulose is an abundant natural biopolymer on earth and most dominating Agricultural waste. This cellulosic biomass is a renewable and abundant resource with great potential for bioconversion to value-added bioproducts. It can be degraded by cellulase produced by cellulolytic bacteria. This enzyme has various industrial applications and now considered as major group of industrial enzyme. The review discusses application of cellulase, classification of cellulase, quantification of cellulase, the types of cellulolytic bacteria and their screening. It describes the current knowledge of cellulase production by submerged fermentation and solid state fermentation, properties of cellulase and cloning and expression of cellulase gene. The biotechnological aspect of cellulase research and their future prospects are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar
Miller, G. L. (1959) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60147a030 · Cited by 28,963
A PHOTOMETRIC ADAPTATION OF THE SOMOGYI METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF GLUCOSE
Nelson, N. (1944) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)71980-7 · Cited by 10,370
Somogyi, M. (1926) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)84465-9 · Cited by 5,596
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Teather, R. M., & Wood, P. J. (1982) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982 · Cited by 1,844
A SUBMICRODETERMINATION OF GLUCOSE
Park, J. T., & Johnson, M. J. (1949) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56635-7 · Cited by 1,570
THE DETERMINATION OF SUGAR IN BLOOD AND SPINAL FLUID WITH ANTHRONE REAGENT
Roe, J. H. (1955) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)71120-4 · Cited by 1,449
Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update
Lynd, L. R., Zyl, W. H. V., McBride, J. E., & Laser, M. (2005) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009 · Cited by 1,449
Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology
Brenner, K., You, L., & Arnold, F. H. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.05.004 · Cited by 1,018
Cellulase, Clostridia, and Ethanol
Demain, A. L., Newcomb, M., & Wu, J. H. D. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.124-154.2005 · Cited by 904
Cited by
Trophic Interactions and the Drivers of Microbial Community Assembly
Gralka, M., Szabo, R., Stocker, R., & Cordero, O. X. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.007 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadhu, S.
- Venue
- British Microbiology Research Journal
- Publisher
- Sciencedomain International
- Published
- 2013-01-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-258
- ISSN
- 2231-0886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006455926
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulase Production by Bacteria: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.9734/bmrj/2013/2367
- The paper
- Sadhu, S. (2013). Cellulase Production by Bacteria: A Review. British Microbiology Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.9734/bmrj/2013/2367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
