Cited by 12Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesLinguistic and Cultural StudiesMedicinal Plant Research

Ethno-Medicinal Plants in Sacred Groves in East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India

Open access
Rampilla, Venkatesh, Mahammad, Khasim·2015·European Journal of Medicinal Plants

Abstract

Aims: An ethnobotanical study was conducted to document traditional medicinal plants used by indigenous people around the four sacred groves (protected forest patches) of East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted around the four sacred groves (protected forest patches) of East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India from 2011-2015. Methodology: The ethnomedicinal knowledge was gathered through interviews of tribal physicians. Data collected were processed using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The data was analyzed using the fidelity level (FL) of each species determined. Results: The study revealed therapeutic applications of 87 plant species belonging to 76 genera and 45 families. These plants are used to cure various ailments such as malaria, jaundice, diabetes, bronchitis, fevers etc. The majority of remedies were taken orally in the form of juice extracted from freshly collected plant parts harvested from the wild. Plants that has the highest FL values are Gymnema sylvestre (100%) and Andrographis paniculata (100%), followed by Phyllanthus amarus (91%). The lowest is Woodfordia fruticosa (46%). The most used plant parts are leaves. Over-exploitation and deforestation and Podu-cultivation are main threats for medicinal plant vulnerability. Conclusion: The documented information regarding therapeutic uses provides basic data for further studies on pharmacological studies and conservation of the most important medicinal plant species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9734/ejmp/2015/18802

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rampilla, V., & Mahammad, K.
Affiliations
Acharya Nagarjuna University (IN)
Venue
European Journal of Medicinal Plants
Published
2015-01-10
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
1-29
ISSN
2231-0894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2201942019
Cited by
12
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Journal of Medicinal Plants (publishedVersion)
  • European Journal of Medicinal Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Linguistic and Cultural Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
ethnomedicinal plants, sacred groves, traditional medicine, medicinal plants, East Godavari district

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review