Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)

PATEL, N. R., PRAJAPATI, B. K., PATHAN, N. P., SANTOKI, DHRUPAL·2025·International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Abstract

Cumin is an important cash crop and its management through integrated pest and disease management is best strategy to increase its productivity both quantitatively and qualitatively. Through this approach the income of the farmers can be enhanced effectively. A field trial was carried out using a randomized block design with three replications during the Rabi seasons of 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 at the Seed Spices Research Station in Jagudan. The application of three sprays of kresoxim-methyl 44.3 SC at 0.044% (10 ml/10 L), with the initial spray applied at the onset of blight disease and subsequent sprays at 15-day intervals, along with two sprays of thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.0084% (3.36 g/10 L), the first at the onset of aphid infestation and the second 10 days later, proved effective in managing both blight and aphid infestation in cumin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i55427

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
PATEL, N. R., PRAJAPATI, B. K., PATHAN, N. P., & SANTOKI, D.
Venue
International Journal of Plant & Soil Science
Published
2025-04-28
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
38-45
ISSN
2320-7035
Cited by
0
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.