The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)
Abstract
Cumin is an important cash crop and its management through integrated pest and disease management is best strategy to increase its productivity both quantitatively and qualitatively. Through this approach the income of the farmers can be enhanced effectively. A field trial was carried out using a randomized block design with three replications during the Rabi seasons of 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 at the Seed Spices Research Station in Jagudan. The application of three sprays of kresoxim-methyl 44.3 SC at 0.044% (10 ml/10 L), with the initial spray applied at the onset of blight disease and subsequent sprays at 15-day intervals, along with two sprays of thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.0084% (3.36 g/10 L), the first at the onset of aphid infestation and the second 10 days later, proved effective in managing both blight and aphid infestation in cumin.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In cumin, kresoxim-methyl and thiamethoxam sprays control blight and aphids (Patel et al. 2025).”
From Unlocking the Apiaceae: comprehensive advances in agronomy, biotechnology, phytochemistry, and health applications of major seed spices (2025) · cites this paper as Patel et al. 2025
Citations
Cited by
Singh, R., Choudhary, S., Kumari, V., Meena, R. S., Meena, N. K., Y, R., & Verma, A. K. (2025) · Journal of Agriculture and Ecology · doi:10.58628/jae-2521-101
Metadata
- Authors
- PATEL, N. R., PRAJAPATI, B. K., PATHAN, N. P., & SANTOKI, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Plant & Soil Science
- Publisher
- Sciencedomain International
- Published
- 2025-04-28
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 38-45
- ISSN
- 2320-7035
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.