Cited by 69Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesSocial Media in Health Education

SMS versus voice messaging to deliver MNCH communication in rural Malawi: assessment of delivery success and user experience

Open access
Crawford, Jessica, Larsen-Cooper, Erin, Jezman, Zachariah, Cunningham, Stacey C, Bancroft, Emily·2014·Global Health: Science and Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in delivery success of health messages delivered through pushed SMS, pushed voice messages sent to personal phones, and voice messages retrieved from a community phone ("retrieved voice messaging"), as well as the difference in quality of the user experience. METHODS: We analyzed the project's electronic monitoring data between September 2011 and June 2013, including demographics, enrollment data, and messages sent and successfully delivered. We also collected and analyzed information from quarterly phone-based surveys with users to assess quality of the user experience, including acceptability, comprehension, new information learned, and reported behavior change. RESULTS: More than half of subscribers enrolled in the retrieved voice messaging service while nearly one-third enrolled in the pushed SMS service and less than 10% in pushed voice messaging. Message delivery success was highest among pushed SMS subscribers and lowest among retrieved voice subscribers. Overall, 99% of survey respondents reported trusting messages they received, and about 75% of respondents recalled the last message they received and learned something new. Almost 75% of respondents reported that they had already changed or intended to change their behavior based on received messages. Intended or actual behavior change was significantly higher among pushed SMS enrollees than among pushed or retrieved voice messaging enrollees (P = .01). CONCLUSION: All message modalities led to high levels of satisfaction, comprehension, and new information learned. Due to lower cost, higher delivery success, and higher levels of intended or actual behavior change, SMS is the preferred delivery modality. However, the majority of users included in this study did not have access to a personal phone, and retrieved voice messages provided an opportunity to access a population that otherwise could not be served. Providing multiple methods by which users could access the service was crucial in extending reach beyond literate personal phone owners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9745/ghsp-d-13-00155

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Grameen Foundation. Mobile technology for community health in Ghana: what it is and what Grameen Foundation has learned so far. 2nd edition. Washington (DC): Grameen Foundation; 2012 Available from: http://www.grameenfoundation.org/sites/grameenfoundation.org/files/MOTECH-Lessons-Learned-Sept-2012.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, J., Larsen-Cooper, E., Jezman, Z., Cunningham, S. C., & Bancroft, E.
Affiliations
VillageReach (US)
Corresponding author
Crawford, Jessica
Venue
Global Health: Science and Practice
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
35-46
ISSN
2169-575X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099019068
Cited by
69
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Global Health Science and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
mobile health, SMS, voice mail, user experience, behavior change, rural Malawi, digital divide
MeSH terms
Communication, Health Education, Humans, Malawi, Maternal Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Health Services, Access to Information, Information Dissemination, Cell Phone, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review