Cited by 17Microbial Inactivation MethodsUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Effect of ultrasonication on sensory and chemical stability of passion fruit juice during refrigerated storage

Open access
Gomez-Lopez, Vicente M., Amaury Martínez-Yepez, Maria E. Buitrago,·2018·Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Passion fruit juice (PFJ) is very susceptible to thermal degradation and may benefit from processing by non-thermal methods such as sonication. This study pursued to test the effect of sonication on sensory quality and related chemical compounds of PFJ during refrigerated storage. Treatment conditions were those of a previous study where a microbiologically stable PFJ was achieved. The effect of ultrasound (20 kHz, 263 W, 89.25 µm) on sensory quality, ºBrix, total titratable acidity (TTA), ºBrix/TTA and reducing and total sugars of PFJ during storage at 4 ºC up to 10 days was studied. Sonication did not cause significant (P>0.05) effects on TTA, ºBrix/TTA and reducing sugars but significantly (P<0.05) increased ºBrix and total sugars content. Panel scored sonication PFJ significantly (P<0.05) lower in colour, flavour and aroma scores; but the global acceptance was similar (P>0.05) than that of non-sonicated juice. Results indicate that sonication of PFJ is a treatment that does not affect the global sensory quality of the product.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i1.1587

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gómez-López, V. M., M. E. Buitrago, M. S. Tapia and A. Martínez- Yépez. 2017. Effect of ultrasonication on microbial quality, color and ascorbic acid of passion-fruit juice during storage. Acta Aliment., 46(4): 470-480. (In Press).
  2. Piyasena, P., E. Mohareb and R. C. McKellar. 2003. Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 87: 207-216.
  3. Sala, F. J., J. Burgos, S. Condon, P. Lopez and J. Raso. 1995. Effect of heat and ultrasound on microorganisms and enzymes. In: G. W. Gould (Ed.), New Methods of Food Preservation, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK, pp. 176-204.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomez-Lopez, V. M., & Amaury Martínez-Yepez, M. E. B.
Venue
Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture
Published
2018-01-31
Pages
85
ISSN
  • 2079-052X (ISSN-L)
  • 2079-0538
OpenAlex
W2806638496
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fondo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
passion fruit juice, sonication, cold storage, sensory quality, chemical stability, titratable acidity, Brix, reducing sugars, total sugar, non-thermal processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review