Effect of ozone and ultrasound treatments on polyphenol content, browning enzyme activities, and shelf life of tender coconut water
Open accessAbstract
The sweet, clear, aqueous part inside the immature green coconut is referred as tender coconut water (TCW). Although several processing techniques have been attempted, preserving the TCW with its wholesome natural property is yet to be achieved. In the present investigation, the nonthermal treatments (ozone and ultrasound) in combination with nisin were used to extend the shelf life of TCW, and the results were compared with heat-treated TCW. The reduction in microbial counts, retention of phenolics (64%) and flavonoids (70%), and inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase enzymes of the fresh TCW by ozone with nisin treatment indicated its superiority over other treatments for preservation. The heat-treated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW were sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks, whereas, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable after 2 weeks of refrigerated storage. Hence, ozone with nisin can be used for the preservation of TCW under refrigerated conditions. Practical applications The work described here shows that the preservation of highly perishable TCW is possible by the use of nonthermal processing methods. The currently used thermal processing of TCW alters its sensory quality; however, use of ozone in combination with nisin was not only able to preserve its nutritional and sensory quality but was also extended its shelf life at refrigerated temperature. Ozone can be easily used at the industrial level to preserve the quality of TCW.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Ozone combined with nisin best preserved tender coconut water among the tested nonthermal treatments, retaining more phenolics and flavonoids and completely inactivating PPO/POD, with sensory acceptability for 3 weeks under refrigeration. Heat-treated TCW was also sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks, while ultrasound with nisin was unacceptable after 2 weeks.
Key findings
- Ozone with nisin retained 64% of phenolics and 70% of flavonoids in fresh TCW and inactivated polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) enzymes, with PPO and POD activities reported as 0 U/ml/h throughout storage.
- Ozone with nisin-treated TCW had a significantly lower browning index than fresh and other treated TCW initially and during storage; heat treatment lowered PPO by 82%, POD by 73%, and PAL by 29%, but did not completely inactivate enzymes.
- Heat-treated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW were sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks, whereas ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable after 2 weeks due to pinkish color and total bacterial count exceeding the FSSAI limit of 1.69 log CFU/ml.
- Heat-treated TCW was microbiologically safe until the fifth week, but sensorily unacceptable after 3 weeks; ozone with nisin-treated TCW showed visible fungal growth during the fourth week of refrigerated storage.
Methods
- Fresh tender coconut water from Mysuru, India, was treated with ozone (20 mg/L at 1 L/min for 5 min selected), ultrasound (20 kHz, 60% amplitude, 6 s pulse for 6 min selected), nisin (5,000 IU/200 ml), heat (85°C for 10 min), or combinations, then stored at 5 ± 1°C.
- A completely randomized design was used; storage studies were conducted only for selected ozone + nisin, ultrasound + nisin, and heat-treated samples, with fresh TCW as control.
- Analyses included physicochemical parameters, total phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, PPO/POD/PAL activities, browning index, microbial counts, and sensory evaluation by eight trained panelists using Quantitative Descriptive Analysis; experiments were done in triplicate and analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey’s test at 5% significance.
Limitations
- The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section. It states that ozone with nisin preserved TCW only for medium-term refrigerated storage and that “combination of other nonthermal hurdles may be required to achieve extended shelf life.”
- It also states that the 85°C heat treatment did not completely inactivate browning enzymes, and residual enzyme activity likely caused browning changes during storage.
- Evident from the text: storage studies were limited to selected treatments, the sensory panel had eight trained panelists, and ozone with nisin-treated samples still developed visible fungal growth by the fourth week, indicating incomplete preservation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 46 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Immediately after ozone treatment with nisin, total flavonoid loss in TCW was 30%.
“Immediately after ozone treatment with nisin, the loss in the ascorbic acid content of TCW was 85%, whereas losses in total phenolics and total flavonoids were 36% and 30%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Heat-treated TCW was sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks of refrigerated storage.
“The heat-treated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW were sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks, whereas, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable after 2 weeks of refrigerated storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin treatment inactivated peroxidase (POD) in TCW.
“The reduction in microbial counts, retention of phenolics (64%) and flavonoids (70%), and inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase enzymes of the fresh TCW by ozone with nisin treatment indicated its superiority over other treatments for preservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Immediately after ozone treatment with nisin, total phenolic loss in TCW was 36%.
“Immediately after ozone treatment with nisin, the loss in the ascorbic acid content of TCW was 85%, whereas losses in total phenolics and total flavonoids were 36% and 30%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin treatment reduced microbial counts in tender coconut water (TCW).
“The reduction in microbial counts, retention of phenolics (64%) and flavonoids (70%), and inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase enzymes of the fresh TCW by ozone with nisin treatment indicated its superiority over other treatments for preservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Ozone with nisin-treated TCW was sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks of refrigerated storage.
“The heat-treated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW were sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks, whereas, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable after 2 weeks of refrigerated storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was sensorily unacceptable after 2 weeks of refrigerated storage.
“The heat-treated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW were sensorily acceptable for 3 weeks, whereas, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable after 2 weeks of refrigerated storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin treatment inactivated polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in TCW.
“The reduction in microbial counts, retention of phenolics (64%) and flavonoids (70%), and inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase enzymes of the fresh TCW by ozone with nisin treatment indicated its superiority over other treatments for preservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The browning index of ozone with nisin-treated TCW was significantly lower than fresh TCW and other treated TCW initially and during storage.
“The browning index of ozone with nisin-treated TCW was significantly (p < .05)lower than fresh TCW and other treated TCW initially as well as during storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Phenolic content of TCW was reduced to 2.12 mg/100 ml (43.5% loss) by heat treatment at 85°C for 10 min.
“The ascorbic acid content of TCW was reduced to 0.69 mg/100 ml (53% loss), phenolic content to 2.12 mg/100 ml (43.5% loss), and flavonoids to 1.45 µg eq of catechin/ml (48% loss) by heat treatment at 85°C for 10 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Heat and ultrasound with nisin treatments caused significant loss of flavonoids in TCW.
“There was significant (p < .05)loss of flavonoids by heat and ultrasound with nisin treatments; however, flavonoid content of ozone with nisin-treated TCW was statistically similar (p > .05) to fresh TCW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fresh TCW had PPO activity of 1,200 ± 207.9 U/ml/h.
“Fresh TCW 1,200 ± 207.9 a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The total phenolic content in fresh TCW was 3.75 mg GAE/100 ml.
“The total phenolic content in the fresh TCW was found to be 3.75 mg GAE/100 ml, which was slightly lower than the earlier reported total phenolic content in the fresh TCW by Mahayothee et al. (2016) (5.18-7.17mg GAE/100 ml), and by Adubofuor et al. (2016) (4.68-9.51mg GAE/100 ml) probably due to maturity, varietal, and climatic differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Flavonoids of TCW were reduced to 1.45 μg eq of catechin/ml (48% loss) by heat treatment at 85°C for 10 min.
“The ascorbic acid content of TCW was reduced to 0.69 mg/100 ml (53% loss), phenolic content to 2.12 mg/100 ml (43.5% loss), and flavonoids to 1.45 µg eq of catechin/ml (48% loss) by heat treatment at 85°C for 10 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Heat treatment did not affect total sugar content significantly (p > .05).
“However, heat treatment did not affect the total sugar content significantly (p > .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ultrasound treatment with nisin did not significantly affect TSS of TCW (4-5°B).
“The titratable acidity (0.64%-0.71% malic acid), pH (4.73-5.02),and TSS (4-5°B) of TCW were not significantly affected by ultrasound treatment with nisin in the present study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Ultrasound treatment with nisin showed significantly higher losses of nutritional and nutraceutical contents of TCW.
“Ultrasound treatment with nisin also showed significantly higher losses of nutritional and nutraceutical contents of TCW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ultrasound treatment with nisin did not significantly affect pH of TCW (4.73-5.02).
“The titratable acidity (0.64%-0.71% malic acid), pH (4.73-5.02),and TSS (4-5°B) of TCW were not significantly affected by ultrasound treatment with nisin in the present study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone treatment with nisin did not have any significant effect on TSS of TCW, which ranged from 4 to 5°B.
“In the present study, ozone treatment with nisin did not have any significant effect on TSS of TCW, which ranged from 4 to 5°B.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin-treated TCW had flavonoid content statistically similar to fresh TCW.
“There was significant (p < .05)loss of flavonoids by heat and ultrasound with nisin treatments; however, flavonoid content of ozone with nisin-treated TCW was statistically similar (p > .05) to fresh TCW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant (p > .05) difference in phenolic content of nonthermally and heat-treated TCW was observed during refrigerated storage.
“Although there was significant (p < .05)loss in total phenolics in treated TCW when compared to fresh TCW, no significant (p > .05)difference in phenolic content of nonthermally and heat-treated TCW was observed during refrigerated storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone treatment with nisin decreased pH from 4.71 to 4.41.
“However, acidity was increased from 0.5% to 0.74% as malic acid, and a simultaneous decrease in pH from 4.71 to 4.41 was observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the end of storage, almost 94% of ascorbic acid was lost in ozone with nisin-treated TCW.
“At the end of the storage, almost 94% of ascorbic acid, 53% of total phenolic, and 20% of total flavonoids were lost in ozone with nisin-treated TCW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At the end of storage, 20% of total flavonoids was lost in ozone with nisin-treated TCW.
“At the end of the storage, almost 94% of ascorbic acid, 53% of total phenolic, and 20% of total flavonoids were lost in ozone with nisin-treated TCW.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ultrasound treatment with nisin did not significantly affect titratable acidity of TCW (0.64%-0.71% malic acid).
“The titratable acidity (0.64%-0.71% malic acid), pH (4.73-5.02),and TSS (4-5°B) of TCW were not significantly affected by ultrasound treatment with nisin in the present study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fresh TCW had POD activity of 8,400 ± 207 U/ml/h.
“Fresh TCW 8,400 ± 207 a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone treatment with nisin increased acidity from 0.5% to 0.74% as malic acid.
“However, acidity was increased from 0.5% to 0.74% as malic acid, and a simultaneous decrease in pH from 4.71 to 4.41 was observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Immediately after ozone treatment with nisin, loss in ascorbic acid content of TCW was 85%.
“Immediately after ozone treatment with nisin, the loss in the ascorbic acid content of TCW was 85%, whereas losses in total phenolics and total flavonoids were 36% and 30%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fresh TCW had browning index of 0.025 ± 0.001.
“Fresh TCW 0.025 ± 0.001 a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the end of storage, 53% of total phenolic was lost in ozone with nisin-treated TCW.
“At the end of the storage, almost 94% of ascorbic acid, 53% of total phenolic, and 20% of total flavonoids were lost in ozone with nisin-treated TCW.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The ascorbic acid content of TCW was reduced to 0.69 mg/100 ml (53% loss) by heat treatment at 85°C for 10 min.
“The ascorbic acid content of TCW was reduced to 0.69 mg/100 ml (53% loss), phenolic content to 2.12 mg/100 ml (43.5% loss), and flavonoids to 1.45 µg eq of catechin/ml (48% loss) by heat treatment at 85°C for 10 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone + Nisin treated TCW had browning index of 0.021 ± 0.006 at 0th day.
“Ozone + Nisin treated TCW 0.021 ± 0.006 d 0.015 ± 0.002 b 0.012 ± 0.001 b 0.014 ± 0.001 c”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone + Nisin treated TCW had zero POD activity at 0th day and throughout storage.
“Ozone + Nisin treated TCW 0 0 0 0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was significant (p < .05) loss in total phenolics in treated TCW when compared to fresh TCW.
“Although there was significant (p < .05)loss in total phenolics in treated TCW when compared to fresh TCW, no significant (p > .05)difference in phenolic content of nonthermally and heat-treated TCW was observed during refrigerated storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone + Nisin treated TCW had zero PPO activity at 0th day and throughout storage.
“Ozone + Nisin treated TCW 0 0 0 0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fungal growth was observed in ozone-treated samples during fourth week of storage at refrigerated condition.
“Fungal growth was observed in ozone-treated samples during the fourth week of storage at the refrigerated condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin-treated TCW showed higher sensory acceptability at end of 3 weeks refrigerated storage.
“Ozone with nisin-treated TCW also showed higher sensory acceptability at the end of 3 weeks refrigerated storage; whereas, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was sensorily not acceptable after 2 weeks of storage due to change in color attributed to oxidation during storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone and nisin, and heat-treated TCW were sensorily acceptable up to 3 weeks.
“The ozone and nisin, and heattreated TCW were sensorily acceptable up to 3 weeks (Figure 1b); however, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable at the end of the third week of storage due to the formation of pinkish color.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was sensorily not acceptable after 2 weeks of storage due to change in color attributed to oxidation during storage.
“Ozone with nisin-treated TCW also showed higher sensory acceptability at the end of 3 weeks refrigerated storage; whereas, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was sensorily not acceptable after 2 weeks of storage due to change in color attributed to oxidation during storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fresh TCW spoiled within a day.
“It was observed that fresh TCW spoiled within a day, and the heattreated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW was stable for 3 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW showed a significantly higher browning index initially and during storage.
“Ultrasound with nisin-treated samples showed a significantly higher (p < .05)browning index initially as well as during storage (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Storage of TCW in the present study was terminated after 3 weeks as thermally treated samples were sensorily unacceptable.
“However, the storage of TCW in the present study was terminated after 3 weeks as the thermally treated samples were sensorily unacceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin-treated TCW spoiled due to visible mold growth during fourth week of storage.
“The ozone with nisin-treated TCW spoiled due to visible mold growth during the fourth week of storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Heat-treated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW was stable for 3 weeks.
“It was observed that fresh TCW spoiled within a day, and the heattreated and ozone with nisin-treated TCW was stable for 3 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable at the end of the third week of storage due to formation of pinkish color.
“The ozone and nisin, and heattreated TCW were sensorily acceptable up to 3 weeks (Figure 1b); however, ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was unacceptable at the end of the third week of storage due to the formation of pinkish color.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Heat treatment at 85°C used in the present study was not able to completely inactivate the enzymes.
“The heat treatment (85°C) used in the present study was not able to completely inactivate the enzymes, and a similar observation was reported by Matsui, Gut, de Oliveira, and Tadini (2008) at 81.2°C heating (D value of 5 min for POD of TCW).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
PAL activity was significantly reduced by ozone and nisin treatment in TCW.
“Baur, Klaiber, Koblo, and Carle (2004) showed that the activity of PAL was significantly reduced when it was prewashed with ozonated water (1 ppm) for 120 s, and in the present study also PAL activity was significantly (p < .05)reduced by ozone and nisin treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW was acceptable only until end of 2 weeks storage, as total bacterial count increased beyond permitted levels.
“In the present study, sample treated with ultrasound with nisin were found acceptable only until the end of 2 weeks storage, as there was an increase in its total bacterial count beyond permitted levels (FSSAI, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FSSAI, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Ozone with nisin-treated TCW was microbiologically safe for 3 weeks at refrigerated conditions.
“The study showed that physicochemical, nutritional and nutraceutical properties were least affected by the ozone with nisin treatment, and treated TCW was microbiologically safe for 3 weeks at refrigerated conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ozone with nisin-treated TCW samples remained acceptable till end of third week.
“Ozone with nisin-treated TCW samples remained acceptable till the end of the third week.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nisin used at highest permissible limit was not able to preserve TCW at room temperature and refrigerated conditions even for a week.
“The Nisin used at the highest permissible limit(FSSAI, 2011) was not able to preserve the TCW at room temperature and refrigerated conditions even for a week.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FSSAI, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
All three treated TCW were acceptable with a sensory score above 9.0.
“All the three treated TCW were acceptable with a sensory score above 9.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No microbial growth was observed in heat-treated samples until 3 weeks storage.
“Further, no microbial growth was observed in heat-treated samples until the 3 weeks storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No PPO and POD enzyme activities were observed during storage in TCW treated with ozone and nisin.
“No PPO and POD enzyme activities and lesser browning index observed during storage in the present study confirm their inactivation by ozone and nisin treatment (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fresh TCW was highly acceptable with a sensory score of 12.9.
“The fresh TCW was highly acceptable with a sensory score of 12.9 (Figure 1a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After 3 weeks storage, visible fungal growth was observed in stored samples.
“However, after 3 weeks storage, the visible fungal growth was observed in stored samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Physicochemical, nutritional and nutraceutical properties were least affected by ozone with nisin treatment.
“The study showed that physicochemical, nutritional and nutraceutical properties were least affected by the ozone with nisin treatment, and treated TCW was microbiologically safe for 3 weeks at refrigerated conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Heat-treated TCW browning index increased after 2 week storage.
“However, an increase in the browning index was observed after 2 week storage, which may be attributed to the residual enzyme activities during prolonged storage (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
PPO and POD are the major browning enzymes responsible for changes in the sensory and nutritional quality of TCW.
“Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and Peroxidase (POD) are the major browning enzymes that are responsible for changes in the sensory and nutritional quality of TCW (Campos, Souza, Coelho, & Gloria, 1996;Duarte, Coelho, & Liete, 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Ozone with nisin treatment is superior to other treatments for preservation of TCW.
“The reduction in microbial counts, retention of phenolics (64%) and flavonoids (70%), and inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase enzymes of the fresh TCW by ozone with nisin treatment indicated its superiority over other treatments for preservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The higher losses in ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW were probably due to production of free radicals that may degrade polyphenols, flavonoids, ascorbic acids, and sugars by oxidizing them.
“The higher losses in ascorbic acid (62.58%), total sugars (31.81%), phenolic content (44.27%), and flavonoids (48.04%) were observed probably due to the production of free radicals that may degrade polyphenols, flavonoids, ascorbic acids, and sugars by oxidizing them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ozone affects proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acid resulting in inactivation of microorganisms.
“Ozone is known to affect proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acid resulting in the inactivation of microorganism.It also oxidizes the lipid component of the cell wall leading to cell lysis (Graham, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Graham, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The reduction in total antioxidant capacity of TCW samples is attributable to loss in phenolics and flavonoids by various treatments.
“The reduction in the total antioxidant capacity of the samples in the present study might be attributed to the loss in phenolics and flavonoids of TCW by various treatments (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Matsui et al. (2008) reported a similar observation at 81.2°C heating (D value of 5 min for POD of TCW).
“The heat treatment (85°C) used in the present study was not able to completely inactivate the enzymes, and a similar observation was reported by Matsui, Gut, de Oliveira, and Tadini (2008) at 81.2°C heating (D value of 5 min for POD of TCW).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matsui, Gut, de Oliveira, and Tadini (2008) source
- Interpretationown data
Ozone and nisin treatment inactivated PPO and POD enzymes in TCW.
“No PPO and POD enzyme activities and lesser browning index observed during storage in the present study confirm their inactivation by ozone and nisin treatment (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The increase in browning index of heat-treated TCW after 2 week storage may be attributed to residual enzyme activities during prolonged storage.
“However, an increase in the browning index was observed after 2 week storage, which may be attributed to the residual enzyme activities during prolonged storage (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Due to high activity of browning enzymes and microbial contamination, fresh TCW spoiled within a day in ambient and refrigerated conditions.
“Due to the high activity of browning enzymes and microbial contamination, the fresh TCW spoiled within a day in ambient and refrigerated conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Baur et al. (2004) showed that PAL activity was significantly reduced when prewashed with ozonated water (1 ppm) for 120 s.
“Baur, Klaiber, Koblo, and Carle (2004) showed that the activity of PAL was significantly reduced when it was prewashed with ozonated water (1 ppm) for 120 s, and in the present study also PAL activity was significantly (p < .05)reduced by ozone and nisin treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baur, Klaiber, Koblo, and Carle (2004) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Incomplete denaturation of browning enzymes probably led to inconsistency in the degree of browning in samples during storage.
“The incomplete denaturation of browning enzymes probably led to inconsistency in the degree of browning in samples during storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Complete inactivation of PPO and POD was observed at higher temperature treatment (90°C) after 550 s and 310 s, respectively.
“However, complete inactivation of PPO and POD was observed at higher temperature treatment (90°C) after 550 s and 310 s, respectively, (Campos et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campos et al., 1996 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Residual activities of browning enzymes were probably responsible for an increase in the browning index of ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW during storage.
“However, due to partial inactivation of browning enzymes present in TCW, probably the residual activities of enzymes were responsible for an increase in the browning index of ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW during storage in the present study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 30
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe total phenolic content in fresh TCW was slightly lower than earlier reported values, probably due to maturity, varietal, and climatic differences.
“The total phenolic content in the fresh TCW was found to be 3.75 mg GAE/100 ml, which was slightly lower than the earlier reported total phenolic content in the fresh TCW by Mahayothee et al. (2016) (5.18-7.17mg GAE/100 ml), and by Adubofuor et al. (2016) (4.68-9.51mg GAE/100 ml) probably due to maturity, varietal, and climatic differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Mahayothee et al., 2016 source
- cites Adubofuor et al., 2016
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationA slight increase in total sugar content of TCW in the present study may be due to higher release of sugars from tissues by ultrasound treatment.
“A slight increase in total sugar content of TCW in the present study may be due to the higher release of sugars from tissues by ultrasound treatment (Gómez-López, Buitrago, & Martínez-Yepez, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gómez-López et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFresh TCW was rich in nutrients and nutraceuticals and had excellent sensory properties.
“Fresh TCW was rich in nutrients (Table 3) and nutraceuticals (Table 4), and had excellent sensory properties (Figure 1a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningHigher losses in ascorbic acid (62.58%), total sugars (31.81%), phenolic content (44.27%), and flavonoids (48.04%) were observed in ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW.
“The higher losses in ascorbic acid (62.58%), total sugars (31.81%), phenolic content (44.27%), and flavonoids (48.04%) were observed probably due to the production of free radicals that may degrade polyphenols, flavonoids, ascorbic acids, and sugars by oxidizing them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeat treatment significantly lowered PPO (82%), POD (73%), and PAL (29%) enzyme activities, and activity of these enzymes was reduced further during storage.
“Heat treatment significantly (p < .05) lowered the PPO (82%), POD (73%), and PAL (29%) enzyme activities, and activity of these enzymes was reduced further during storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFresh TCW had desired sweet-sourish flavor of 5.2 and high pleasantness of 13.5, with optimum sweet (4.6), sour (4.6), and astringency of 6.7.
“It has a desired sweet-sourish flavor of 5.2 and high pleasantness of 13.5, with optimum sweet (4.6), sour (4.6), and astringency of 6.7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeat-treated samples in present study were microbiologically safe for consumption till fifth week of storage; however, sensorily unacceptable after 3 weeks due to loss of desirable sweet-sour flavor and development of astringent quality.
“Heat-treated samples in the present study were microbiologically safe for consumption till the fifth week of storage; however, sensorily it was unacceptable after 3 weeks of storage due to the loss of the desirable sweet-sour flavor and development of astringent quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll treated TCW after first and second week of storage did not show any significant change in taste quality, and maintained acceptability like initial treated TCW.
“All treated TCW after the first and second week of storage did not show any significant change in taste quality, and maintained the acceptability like initial treated TCW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter 2 weeks storage of ultrasound-treated TCW, total bacterial count exceeded regulatory limit of 1.69 log CFU/ml, and its shelf life was terminated.
“However, after 2 weeks of storage of ultrasound-treated TCW, the total bacterial count exceeded the regulatory limit of 1.69 log CFU/ml (FSSAI, 2011), and its shelf life was terminated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FSSAI, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeat-treated TCW at end of fourth week of storage was not acceptable as desirable sweet-sour flavor was completely lost and it showed poor pleasantness with reduction in sweet and sour taste and development of astringent quality.
“However, heat-treated TCW, at the end of the fourth week of storage was not acceptable as the desirable sweet-sour flavor was completely lost and it showed poor pleasantness with a reduction in sweet and sour taste and development of astringent quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOzone- and ultrasound-treated samples with and without nisin stored in ambient condition, as well as treated samples without nisin stored in refrigerated condition, were spoiled within a week of treatment.
“The ozone-and ultrasound-treated samples with and without nisin stored in ambient condition, as well as treated samples without nisin stored in refrigerated condition were spoiled within a week of the treatment (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeating at 85°C for 10 min eliminated complete bacterial population (2.47 log CFU/ml in control sample), and no yeast and molds as well as E. coli were observed in treated sample.
“Heating at 85°C for 10 min was able to eliminate the complete bacterial population (2.47 log CFU/ml in control sample), and no yeast and molds as well as E. coli were observed in the treated sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTreatment of TCW using ozone with nisin was able to reduce bacteria and destroy E. coli initially.
“The treatment of TCW using ozone with nisin was able to reduce bacteria and destroy the E. coli initially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPreliminary studies showed that ozone treatment for 5 min at 20 mg/L feed rate and ultrasound treatment for 6 min at 60% amplitude with 6 s pulse and 20 kHz frequency were best for retention of initial quality parameters.
“The preliminary studies with ozone and ultrasound treatments for variable times showed that the ozone treatment for 5 min at 20 mg/L feed rate and ultrasound treatment for 6 min at 60% amplitude with 6 s pulse and 20 kHz frequency were the best for retention of initial quality parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningHeat-treated TCW browning index just after treatment was higher than control and decreased significantly during initial storage.
“As the enzymatic activities were lowered by heat application, the browning index just after treatment (higher than control) decreased significantly (p < .05)during initial storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUltrasound with nisin treatment reduced PPO activity by 50%, POD by 30%, and PAL by 35%, and their activities further decreased upon storage.
“The enzyme activity reduction by ultrasound with nisin treatment was 50% for PPO, 30% for POD, and 35% for PAL, and their activities were further decreased upon storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFresh TCW had high activity of browning enzymes and presence of microbial contaminants (total aerobic mesophilic count 0.4-2.47 log CFU/ml; yeast and mold count 0-2.3 log CFU/ml; and in some batches presence of E. coli).
“high activity of browning enzymes (Table5) and showed presence of microbial contaminants (total aerobic mesophilic count in the range of 0.4-2.47 log CFU/ml in different batches; yeast and mold count from 0 to 2.3 log CFU/ml in different batches; and in some batches presence of E. coli).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUltrasound treatment of 60% amplitude for 6 min with nisin reduced bacterial population by two log cells, and no growth of yeast and molds and E. coli was observed in treated TCW.
“The ultrasound treatment of 60% amplitude for 6 min with nisin was able to reduce the bacterial population by two log cells, and no growth of the yeast and molds and E. coli was observed in treated TCW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFresh TCW had thin liquid like consistency with cloudy or opaque (1.9) like appearance.
“The fresh TCW had thin liquid like consistency with cloudy or opaque (1.9) like appearance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe greater change in pH and acidity in TCW observed in the present study may be due to the higher flow rate of ozone used.
“A slightly greater change in the pH and acidity in the TCW observed in the present study may be due to the higher flow rate of ozone used in the present study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOzone oxidizes the lipid component of the cell wall leading to cell lysis.
“Ozone is known to affect proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acid resulting in the inactivation of microorganism.It also oxidizes the lipid component of the cell wall leading to cell lysis (Graham, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Graham, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFDA has recognized ozone as GRAS, and it is approved by USFDA as an antimicrobial agent.
“Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized ozone as GRAS, and it is approved by USFDA as an antimicrobial agent (FDA, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FDA, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe refractometer was calibrated with ultrapure water just before use.
“Total soluble solids (TSS) were measured using a refractometer (Erma, Japan), which was calibrated with ultrapure water just before use by ensuring 0°B reading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent preservation techniques have been investigated, but preserving TCW with its wholesome natural property remains a challenge.
“Different preservation techniques like filtration, reverse osmosis, spray drying, carbonation, addition of preservatives, UV treatment, pulsed electric field, and high pressure carbon dioxide has been investigated; but preserving the TCW with its wholesome natural property remains a challenge (Gautam et al., 2017;Purkayastha et al., 2012;Reddy, Das, & Das, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe pH meter was calibrated with standard pH buffers 4 and 7 just before use.
“The pH of the sample was measured at room temperature by using pH meter (pH Tutor, Eutech Instruments, Singapore), which was calibrated with standard pH buffers 4 and 7 just before use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenANOVA was performed and means were compared using Tukey's test, with significance at 5% level.
“ANOVA was performed and the means were compared using Tukey's test.All the values during storage were compared with fresh TCW for each parameter.The significance of the values was determined at 5% level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOzone treatment causes oxidation of ascorbic acid, flavonoids, and phenolics, resulting in reduction in their contents.
“Ozone treatment causes oxidation of the ascorbic acid, flavonoids, and phenolics (Allende, Marin, Buendia, Thomas-Barberan, & Gil, 2007), resulting in a reduction in their contents, and a decrease in polyphenol content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant capacity was observed in ozone-treated guava fruit after 10 min of treatment (Alothman, Kaur, Fazilah, Bhat, & Karim, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOzone decomposes rapidly and does not leave any residue in foods.
“It decomposes rapidly and does not leave any residue in foods (Graham, 1999;Khadre et al.,2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Graham, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Khadre et al., 2001 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh intensity ultrasound (10-1000 W/cm2) is used to promote chemical reaction and cause physical disruption of tissues; free radicals formed by sonolysis of water have bactericidal properties.
“High intensity ultrasound (10-1000 W/cm 2 ) is used to promote the chemical reaction and to cause physical disruption of tissues; and the free radicals formed by sonolysis of water have bactericidal properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Piyasena et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMicro jets produced by sonication can cause severe cell damage.
“Further, the micro jets produced by sonication can cause severe cell damage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Piyasena et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA completely randomized design was followed for the experiment.
“A completely randomized design was followed for the experiment using the standardized conditions from pretest results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEight trained sensory panelists with more than 10 years of experience participated in the tasting.
“The participating sensory panelists were trained panelist having more than 10 years of experience in the field of sensory science.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe heat treatment condition (time-temperature combination) was optimized in a preliminary study based on microbial safety.
“The heat treatment condition (time-temperature combination) was optimized in the preliminary study based on microbial safety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdil et al. (2015) observed a significant decrease in total antioxidant capacity (approx.30%), total flavonoid content (approx.20%), and total phenols (approx.2%) during 15 days storage of ultrasound-treated grape juice.
“Adil et al. (2015) also observed a significant decrease in total antioxidant capacity (approx.30%), total flavonoid content (approx.20%), and total phenols (approx.2%) during 15 days storage of ultrasound-treated grape juice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adil et al. (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningSensory analysis was conducted in sensory booths designed according to ASTM standard methods to minimize panelist biases and maximize sensitivity.
“The fresh TCW along with ozone-, heat-, and ultrasound-treated TCW were sensorily analyzed in sensory booths designed according to ASTM standard methods to minimize the panelist biases and maximize their sensitivity by eliminating variables that do not originate in the products themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBrowning in foods due to reactions between sugar and amino acids, vitamin C decomposition, and pigment destruction is measured in terms of the browning index, an indicator of nonenzymatic browning.
“Browning occurring in foods due to the reactions between sugar and amino acids, vitamin C decomposition, and pigment destruction is measured in terms of the browning index, which is an indicator of nonenzymatic browning (Damasceno, Fernandes, Magalhães, & Brito, 2008;Ricci, Parpinello, & Versari, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPOD catalyses phenolic oxidation reactions to produce browning.
“pigment, whereas POD catalyses phenolic oxidation reactions to produce browning (Campos et al., 1996;Zhang, Pang, Xuewu, Ji, & Jiang, 2005b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Campos et al., 1996 source
- cites Zhang et al., 2005b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThermal treatment of TCW alters its characteristic flavor and decreases its nutritional value.
“Thermal treatment, the commonly used processing technique of TCW, alters its characteristic flavor as well as decreases the nutritional value (Chowdhury, Rahman, Tariqul Islam, & Islam, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chowdhury et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPPO uses polyphenol as a substrate and through rapid polymerization of O-quinones produces brown, black, or red pigment.
“PPO uses polyphenol as a substrate and through rapid polymerization of O-quinones produces brown, black, or red”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Campos et al., 1996 source
- cites Zhang et al., 2005b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGeneration of shear stress by stable cavitation when sound waves pass through liquid media can breakdown macromolecules.
“The generation of shear stress by stable cavitation when sound waves pass through liquid media can breakdown macromolecules (Piyasena, Mohareb, & McKellar, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Piyasena et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOzone is a powerful oxidant having an oxidation potential of 2.07 V in alkaline solution; hence, it can be used as an effective antimicrobial agent.
“Ozone is a powerful oxidant having an oxidation potential of 2.07 V in alkaline solution; hence, it can be used as an effective antimicrobial agent (Kim, Yousef, & Dave, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 1999 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll experiments were done in triplicate.
“All the experiments were done in triplicate, and the data were presented as mean ± standard deviation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCarrot juice treated by ultrasound for 20-60 min showed a significant increase in time-dependent reduction in total plate count and total yeast and mold count.
“Carrot juice treated by ultrasound for 20-60 min showed a significant increase in time-dependent reduction in total plate count as well as total yeast and mold count (Zou & Jiang, 2016), and the similar results were also reported for apple juice (Abid et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zou & Jiang, 2016 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFSSAI (2011) prescribes acceptable limits for TCW of 1.69 log CFU/ml for total plate count, 0.301 log CFU/ml for yeast and molds, and absence of E. coli.
“TCW was considered safe until the microbial count was found to be in acceptable limits as prescribed by FSSAI (2011) with limits of 1.69 log CFU/ml for total plate count, 0.301 log CFU/ml for yeast and molds, and absence of E. coli.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FSSAI (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRico et al. (2006) reported efficacy of ozone against PPO and POD enzymes in fresh cut lettuce dipped for 5 min in water containing 1 ppm ozone.
“Rico, Martin-Diana, Frias, Gary, and Barry-Ryan (2006) also reported the efficacy of ozone against PPO and POD enzymes in fresh cut lettuce dipped for 5 min in water containing 1 ppm ozone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rico, Martin-Diana, Frias, Gary, and Barry-Ryan (2006) source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationZenker et al. (2003) reported 2.5 log reduction of E. coli K12 in carrot juice with ultrasound treatment of 19.3 kHz for 1 min at 60°C.
“Zenker, Hienz, and Knorr (2003) reported 2.5 log reduction of E. coli K12 in carrot juice with the ultrasound treatment of 19.3 kHz for 1 min at 60°C; and 3.4 log cells reduction of total mesophilic aerobes in orange juice at 500 kHz for 15 min at 60°C was reported by Valero et al. (2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zenker, Hienz, and Knorr (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationShivakumar et al. (2017) observed complete inactivation of POD after 5 min treatment at 95°C.
“Shivakumar et al. (2017) also observed complete inactivation of POD after 5 min treatment at 95°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shivakumar et al. (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSun et al. (2015) reported that ultrasound-treated apple juice showed a higher browning index than untreated apple juice.
“Similar results were reported by Sun et al. (2015) for ultrasound-treated apple juice, which showed a higher browning index than untreated apple juice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al. (2015) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTazeen et al. (2016) reported that ozone processing (50-100 μg/ml) for variable time (2-12 min) was able to preserve TCW for maximum of 12 days at 4°C.
“Tazeen, Vardharaju, and Chandrasekar (2016) reported that ozone processing (50-100 µg/ ml) for a variable time (2-12 min) was able to preserve TCW for a maximum of 12 days at 4°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tazeen, Vardharaju, and Chandrasekar (2016)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPinking was probably due to oxidation of phenolic compound to O-quinone or melanin pigment by residual activity of browning enzymes, which further deepened with increase in storage period.
“The pinking was probably due to the oxidation of phenolic compound to O-quinone or melanin pigment (Purohit, Behera, & Mishra, 2016) by residual activity of browning enzymes, which further deepened with increase in storage period.”
- Also stated in: § 3.6 | Shelf life of TCW · hedged
“Further, the color of treated TCW turned pinkish after second week storage, which may be due to the oxidation of phenolic content (Purohit et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Purohit, Behera, & Mishra, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 3.6 | Shelf life of TCW · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPatil et al. (2010) reported effectiveness of ozone for inactivation of Listeria species (5 log cycle reduction) at 75-78 μg/ml ozone between 5.05 and 8.44 min in orange juice.
“The effectiveness of ozone for inactivation of Listeria species (5 log cycle reduction) at a concentration of 75-78 µg/ml of ozone between 5.05 and 8.44 min treatments in orange juice was reported earlier by Patil, Valdramidis, Cullen, Frias, and Bourke (2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Patil, Valdramidis, Cullen, Frias, and Bourke (2010)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationValero et al. (2007) reported 3.4 log cells reduction of total mesophilic aerobes in orange juice at 500 kHz for 15 min at 60°C.
“Zenker, Hienz, and Knorr (2003) reported 2.5 log reduction of E. coli K12 in carrot juice with the ultrasound treatment of 19.3 kHz for 1 min at 60°C; and 3.4 log cells reduction of total mesophilic aerobes in orange juice at 500 kHz for 15 min at 60°C was reported by Valero et al. (2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Valero et al. (2007) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationZhao et al. (2013) reported complete inactivation of yeast and mold at 85°C heat treatment for 15 s in cucumber juice.
“Zhao et al. (2013) also reported complete inactivation of yeast and mold at 85°C heat treatment for 15 s in cucumber juice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al. (2013) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCelery dipped in water containing ozone at 0.03, 0.008, and 0.018 ppm for 5 min showed reduced PPO activity.
“Celery dipped in water containing ozone at a concentration of 0.03, 0.008, and 0.018 ppm for 5 min also showed reduced PPO activity (Zhang, Pang et al., 2005b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang, Pang et al., 2005b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChowdhury et al. (2008) reported longer shelf life of TCW treated at 70°C (2 months), 80°C (3 months), and 90 and 100°C (6 months) at ambient temperature; however, their sensory quality was not described.
“The longer shelf life of TCW treated at 70°C (2 months), 80°C (3 months), and 90 and 100°C (6 months) at ambient temperature was reported (Chowdhury et al., 2008); however, their sensory quality was not described.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chowdhury et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
TCW starts to deteriorate once exposed to air and stored at ambient temperature due to microbial contamination and oxidation reactions, causing changes in its sensory properties.
“TCW starts to deteriorate once it is exposed to the air and stored at ambient temperature due to microbial contamination as well as oxidation reactions, which cause changes in its sensory properties.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Combination of nisin and ozone processing inactivated both POD and PPO activity to undetectable levels.
“On the other hand, the combination of nisin and ozone processing extended the shelf life of CW to three weeks and inactivated both POD and PPO activity to undetectable levels while preserving its physicochemical, nutritional, and nutraceutical properties.”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Ultrasound treatment at 60% amplitude with a 6 s pulse at 20 kHz for 6 min retained the initial quality parameters of CW.
“For instance, while ultrasound treatment at 60% amplitude with a 6 s pulse at a 20 kHz frequency for 6 min retained the initial quality parameters of CW, spoilage occurred within one week under both ambient and refrigerated conditions [17].”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Addition of nisin at 5000 IU/200 mL to ultrasound-treated CW extended its shelf life to two weeks under refrigerated conditions.
“The addition of nisin at a final concentration of 5000 IU/200 mL to ultrasound-treated CW extended its shelf life to two weeks under refrigerated conditions but significantly decreased its nutritional and nutraceutical contents [17].”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
After ultrasound treatment at 60% amplitude with a 6 s pulse at 20 kHz for 6 min, spoilage of CW occurred within one week under both ambient and refrigerated conditions.
“For instance, while ultrasound treatment at 60% amplitude with a 6 s pulse at a 20 kHz frequency for 6 min retained the initial quality parameters of CW, spoilage occurred within one week under both ambient and refrigerated conditions [17].”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Addition of nisin at 5000 IU/200 mL to ultrasound-treated CW significantly decreased its nutritional and nutraceutical contents.
“The addition of nisin at a final concentration of 5000 IU/200 mL to ultrasound-treated CW extended its shelf life to two weeks under refrigerated conditions but significantly decreased its nutritional and nutraceutical contents [17].”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Combination of nisin and ozone processing preserved the physicochemical, nutritional, and nutraceutical properties of CW.
“On the other hand, the combination of nisin and ozone processing extended the shelf life of CW to three weeks and inactivated both POD and PPO activity to undetectable levels while preserving its physicochemical, nutritional, and nutraceutical properties.”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Combination of nisin and ozone processing extended the shelf life of CW to three weeks.
“On the other hand, the combination of nisin and ozone processing extended the shelf life of CW to three weeks and inactivated both POD and PPO activity to undetectable levels while preserving its physicochemical, nutritional, and nutraceutical properties.”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Ozone processing at 0.02 mg/mL led to spoilage of CW within one week of refrigerated storage.
“Nevertheless, Rajashri, Roopa, Negi, and Rastogi [17] demonstrated that ozone processing at 0.02 mg/mL led to spoilage of CW within one week of refrigerated storage.”
From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ultrasound browning index decreases rather than increases during storage
MinorThe reported browning index falls from 0.053 initially to 0.050 and then 0.048 during storage, contrary to the stated increase.
“the residual activities of enzymes were responsible for an increase in the browning index of ultrasound with nisin-treated TCW during storage in the present study.”
“Ultrasound + Nisin treated TCW 0.053 ± 0.003 b 0.050 ± 0.001 c 0.048 ± 0.002 c *”
Antioxidant-capacity measurement has two stated wavelengths
MinorThe same method specifies measurement at both 695 nm and 700 nm.
“Total antioxidant capacity was measured spectrophotometrically at 695 nm”
“the color developed was measured at 700 nm against a blank.”
Phenolic-content significance claim conflicts with Table 4
MinorThe text says treated samples did not differ significantly during refrigerated storage. At the first week, Table 4 assigns ozone-treated TCW the letter b and ultrasound-treated TCW the letter c; under the table's stated lettering convention, these indicate a significant difference.
“no significant (p > .05)difference in phenolic content of nonthermally and heat-treated TCW was observed during refrigerated storage.”
“Ozone + Nisin treated TCW 2.39 ± 0.07 b 2.08 ± 0.09 b 1.89 ± 0.06 b 1.75 ± 0.05 b Ultrasound + Nisin treated TCW 2.09 ± 0.14 b 1.51 ± 0.13 c 1.58 ± 0.09 b *”
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269 · see citing works
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1 · Cited by 19,125 · see citing works
Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T., & Wu, J. (1999) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0308-8146(98)00102-2 · Cited by 8,868 · see citing works
Prieto, P., Pineda, M., & Aguilar, M. R. (1999) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1999.4019 · Cited by 6,232 · see citing works
(1966) · Food and Cosmetics Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0015-6264(66)80573-4 · Cited by 4,287 · see citing works
Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products
Rangana, S., Stuessy, T. F., Crawford, D. J., & Lee, N. S. (1986) · Cited by 3,128 · see citing works
Meilgaard, M. C., Carr, B. T., & Civille, G. V. (1999) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003040729 · Cited by 2,388 · see citing works
Tungmunnithum, D., Thongboonyou, A., Pholboon, A., & Yangsabai, A. (2018) · Medicines · doi:10.3390/medicines5030093 · Cited by 1,969 · see citing works
Application of Ozone for Enhancing the Microbiological Safety and Quality of Foods: A Review
Kim, J.-G., Yousef, A. E., & Dave, S. (1999) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-62.9.1071 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: a review
Piyasena, P., Mohareb, E., & McKellar, R. C. (2003) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00075-8 · Cited by 886 · see citing works
Microbiological Aspects of Ozone Applications in Food: A Review
Khadre, M. A., Yousef, A. E., & Kim, J. ‐. (2001) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15196.x · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Cheng, G. W., & Breen, P. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science · doi:10.21273/jashs.116.5.865 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Sensory Evaluation Techniques, Third Edition
Meilgaard, M. C., Civille, G. V., & Carr, B. T. (1999) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781439832271 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Effect of ultrasonic processing on food enzymes of industrial importance
O’Donnell, C. P., Tiwari, B. K., Bourke, P., et al. (2010) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2010.04.007 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
O’Shea, N., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2012) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.06.002 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Role of peroxidase in anthocyanin degradation in litchi fruit pericarp
Zhang, Z., Pang, X., Duan, X., Zuoliang, J., & Jiang, Y. (2004) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.023 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Effect of ultrasound on different quality parameters of apple juice
Abid, M., Jabbar, S., Wu, T., Hashim, M. M., Hu, B., Lei, S., Zhang, X., & Zeng, X. (2013) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.02.010 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Polyphenol composition, vitamin C content and antioxidant capacity of Mauritian citrus fruit pulps
Ramful‐Baboolall, D., Tarnus, E., Aruoma, O. I., Bourdon, E., & Bahorun, T. (2011) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.056 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Use of ozone for food processing
Graham, D. M. (1997) · Food technology · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Effects of Ozone Treatment on Postharvest Strawberry Quality
Pérez, A. G., Sanz, C., Ríos, J. J., Olías, R., & Olías, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980829l · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Effects of ultrasonic treatments in orange juice processing
Valero, M., Recrosio, N., Saura, D., Muñoz, N., Martí, N., & Lizama, V. (2007) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.06.009 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Quantitative descriptive analysis: developments, applications and the future
Stone, H., & Sidel, J. L. (1998) · Food technology · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Preservation of fresh-cut celery by treatment of ozonated water
Zhang, L., Lu, Z., Yu, Z., & Gao, X. (2004) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.03.007 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Ozone-induced changes of antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut tropical fruits
Alothman, M., Kaur, B., Fazilah, A., Bhat, R., & Karim, A. A. (2010) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2010.08.008 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Power ultrasound processing of cantaloupe melon juice: Effects on quality parameters
Fonteles, T. V., Costa, M. G. M., de Jesus, A. L. T., de Miranda, M. R. A., Fernandes, F. A. N., & Rodrigues, S. (2012) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2012.02.013 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Zenker, M., Heinz, V., & Knorr, D. (2003) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-66.9.1642 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Matsui, K. N., Gut, J. A. W., de Oliveira, P. V., & Tadini, C. C. (2008) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.003 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
CAMPOS, C. F., SOUZA, P. E. A., COELHO, J. V., & GLÓRIA, M. B. A. (1996) · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.1996.tb00761.x · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Allende, A., Marín, A., Buendía, B., Tomás-Barberán, F., & Gil, M. I. (2007) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.05.007 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Mahayothee, B., Koomyart, I., Khuwijitjaru, P., Siriwongwilaichat, P., Nagle, M., & Müller, J. (2016) · International Journal of Food Properties · doi:10.1080/10942912.2015.1099042 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Zhao, L., Wang, S., Liu, F., Dong, P., Huang, W., Xiong, L., & Liao, X. (2013) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.10.004 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Kinetics of Freshly Squeezed Orange Juice Quality Changes during Ozone Processing
Tiwari, B. K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’Donnell, C. P., & Cullen, P. J. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf800515e · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Rico, D., Martín‐Diana, A. B., Frías, J. M., Henehan, G. T., & Barry‐Ryan, C. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2594 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Damasceno, L. F., Fernandes, F. A. N., Magalhães, M. M. A., & Brito, E. S. (2008) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.063 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Effect of ultrasound treatment on quality and microbial load of carrot juice
ZOU, Y., & JIANG, A. (2016) · Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1590/1678-457x.0061 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Baur, S., Klaiber, R. G., Koblo, A., & Carle, R. (2004) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf048961a · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Sun, Y., Zhong, L., Cao, L., Lin, W., & Ye, X. (2015) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-015-1896-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Filtration resistances in non-thermal sterilization of green coconut water
Reddy, K. V., Das, M., & Das, S. K. (2005) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.08.029 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Degradation kinetics of tomato juice quality parameters by ozonation
Tiwari, B. K., Donnell, C. P. O., Brunton, N. P., & Cullen, P. J. (2009) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.01946.x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Inactivation of Spoiling Yeasts of Fruit Juices by Pulsed Ultrasound
Bevilacqua, A., Speranza, B., Campaniello, D., et al. (2013) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-013-1178-5 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Patil, S., Valdramidis, V., Cullen, P. J., et al. (2010) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.031 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Das Purkayastha, M., Kalita, D., Mahnot, N. K., Mahanta, C. L., Mandal, M., & Chaudhuri, M. K. (2012) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.04.007 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Nonthermal pasteurization of tender coconut water using a continuous flow coiled UV reactor
Gautam, D., Umagiliyage, A. L., Dhital, R., Joshi, P., Watson, D. G., Fisher, D. J., & Choudhary, R. (2017) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.008 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Ricci, A., Parpinello, G. P., & Versari, A. (2017) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/ijfs.13303 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Duarte, A. C. P., Coelho, M. A. Z., & Leite, S. G. F. (2002) · Ciencia y Tecnologia Alimentaria · doi:10.1080/11358120209487737 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
(2016) · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Thermal Treatment of Tender Coconut Water – Enzyme Inactivation and Biochemical Characterization
Sanganamoni, S., Mallesh, S. B., Vandana, K. B., & Rao, P. S. (2017) · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.331 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gomez-Lopez, V. M., & Amaury Martínez-Yepez, M. E. B. (2018) · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i1.1587 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
(2009) · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Influence of power ultrasound on the quality parameters of grapefruit juice during storage
Aadil, R. M., Zeng, X., Abbasi, A. M., et al. (2014) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Binduheva, U., & Negi, P. S. (2014) · Acta Alimentaria · doi:10.1556/aalim.43.2014.3.3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- FDA (Food & Drug Administration), 1995, Beverages: Bottled water; final rule, food and drug administration, Federal Regulations, 60, 57075
- FSSAI (Food Safety & Standards Authority of India), 2011, Food safety & standards food product standards & food additives) regulation
- Macheix J. J., 1990, Fruit phenolics, 378
- Purohit S. R., 2016, Colour based quality deterioration of tender coconut water, International Journal of Food Science and Nutritional Science, 5, 92
- Reddy E. P., 2014, Coconut water‐ Properties, uses, nutritional benefits in health and wealth and in health and disease: A review, Journal of Current Trends in Clinical Medicine and Laboratory Biochemistry, 2, 6
- Tazeen H., 2016, Influence of ozonation on the some physicochemical properties of tender coconut water, Advances in Life Science, 5, 4153
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tender Coconut Water: A Review on Recent Advances in Processing and Preservation
Naik, M., C. K., S., Rawson, A., & N, V. (2022) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2020.1785489 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Non-Thermal processing of tender coconut water—A review
Rajashri, K., Rastogi, N. K., & Negi, P. S. (2022) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2020.1847142 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationPandiselvam, R., Prithviraj, V., Manikantan, M. R., Beegum, P. P. S., Ramesh, S. V., Kothakota, A., Mathew, A. C., Hebbar, K. B., Maerescu, C. M., Criste, F. L., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.977655 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Shi, S., Wang, W., Wang, F., Yang, P., Yang, H., He, X., & Liao, X. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14091503 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Malafatti, J. O. D., da Costa Brito, S., Pereira, V. A. C., Calisto, Í., Netto, S. B., Formigoni, C. E., Innocentini, M. D. D. M., Mitsuyuki, M. C., Sivieri, K., & Ferreira, M. D. (2025) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.2880
- Authors
- Rajashri, K., Roopa, B. S., Negi, P. S., & Rastogi, N. K.
- Affiliations
- Central Food Technological Research Institute (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Negi, Pradeep Singh
- Venue
- Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-30
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0145-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-4549
- OpenAlex
- W2997541809
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- African Laser Centre, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (MLP 0204)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
- Keywords
- tender coconut water, ozone treatment, ultrasound treatment, nisin, shelf life extension, polyphenol content, flavonoids, polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, non-thermal processing, cold storage, heat treatment (food and biological processing), sensory quality, microbial inactivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review