The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between management’s view on corporate\nsocial responsibility (CSR) and firms’ actual CSR efforts. It focuses on the practices\nof 111 Dutch firms with respect to five stakeholder groups—employees, supplies, customers,\ncompetitors and society at large—and their use of organisational instruments.\nWe find that the moral (intrinsic) motive, which holds that CSR is a moral duty\nof companies towards society, induces a stronger involvement in CSR than the strategic\n(extrinsic) motive, which holds that CSR contributes to the financial success of\nthe company in the long run. This particularly applies to ethical aspects of employee\nrelations and the use of instruments to integrate CSR in the company’s organisation.\nWith respect to consumer relations, the strategic and moral motives are equally\nimportant. As for relations with suppliers and competitors and society at large, we\ndo not find a significant relationship between management’s strategic and moral\nview on CSR and actual CSR performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
WHAT'S IN A NAME? REPUTATION BUILDING AND CORPORATE STRATEGY.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256324 · Cited by 5,411
Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings From Sweden
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88079-7_22 · Cited by 4,529
The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252190 · Cited by 4,197
CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS TO PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES.
TURBAN, D. B., & GREENING, D. W. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257057 · Cited by 3,149
Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800304 · Cited by 2,305
Not just for the money: an economic theory of personal motivation
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1009 · Cited by 1,955
Cited by
Alcañiz, E. B., Cáceres, R. C., & Pérez, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x · Cited by 291
Fassin, Y., & Buelens, M. (2011) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741111126503 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Graafland, J., & van de Ven, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Corporate Citizenship
- Publisher
- GSE Research Limited
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 2006
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 111-123
- ISSN
- 1470-5001 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-4700
- OpenAlex
- W2087578669
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 25.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2006.su.00012
- The paper
- Graafland, J., & van de Ven, B. (2006). Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2006.su.00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.