The Panoptic Librarian: The Role of Video Surveillance in the Modern Public Library
Open accessAbstract
Libraries have long maintained strong protections for patron privacy and intellectual freedom. However, the increasing prevalence of sophisticated surveillance systems in public libraries potentially threatens these core library commitments. This paper presents the findings of a qualitative case study examining why four libraries in the US and the UK installed video surveillance and how they manage these systems to balance safety and privacy. We examine the experience of these libraries, including one that later reversed course and completely removed all of its previously installed systems. We find that the libraries who install surveillance initially do so as either a response to specific incidents of crime or as part of the design of new buildings. Libraries maintain varying policies about whether video footage is protected as part of patron records, about dealing with law enforcement requests for footage, and whether patrons ought to maintain any expectation of privacy while inside libraries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reference spaces that prioritize height or clear lines of sight place the librarian or desk occupant in a disciplinary surveillance role over a space when supervisory bodies are consistently White and surveilled bodies are expected to be docile.
“Reference spaces that prioritize height or clear lines of sight that put the librarian or occupant of the desk in a disciplinary role of surveillance over a particular space when the bodies that occupy that supervisory position are consistently White, and the bodies under surveillance are expected to be docile (Feagin & Sikes, 1994;Randall & Newell, 2014).”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Randall & Newell, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library
Brook, F., Ellenwood, D., & Lazzaro, A. E. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0048 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Randall, D. P., & Newell, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Bryce Clayton Newell
- Venue
- iConference 2014 Proceedings
- Publisher
- iSchools
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W13685609
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- iConference (publishedVersion)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- video surveillance, public libraries, patron privacy, freedom of thought, library security, surveillance policy, privacy expectations, library building design, crime prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review