Cited by 130Colonialism, slavery, and tradeHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsPolitical Theory and Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Anti-Slavery Project: From the Slave Trade to Human Trafficking

Quirk, Joel·2011·University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks

Abstract

Historian and human rights scholar Joel Quirk examines the evolution of political opposition to slavery from the mid-eighteenth century to the present day. He offers an original diagnosis of the underlying causes driving one of the most pressing human rights problems in the world today.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9783/9780812205640

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 130

Metadata

Authors
Quirk, J.
Corresponding author
Quirk, Joel
Venue
University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks
Published
2011-12-31
OpenAlex
W2251246529
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.80
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Influence
Keywords
abolitionism, human rights, slavery, eighteenth century to present

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review