CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mountain, Field, and Family: The Economy and Human Ecology of an Andean Valley

Brush, Stephen B.·1977
DOI 10.9783/9781512800982
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9783/9781512800982

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study shows trends observed elsewhere in the Andes, with dwellings concentrated at altitude ranges with the highest potential yields of staple crops and additional stations at different altitude levels to ensure an extra harvest or cultivate a variety of produce.

    “Our study also shows trends in settlement observed elsewhere in the Andes, with dwellings concentrated at altitude ranges with the highest potential yields of staple crops, and additional stations at different altitude levels to ensure an extra harvest or to cultivate a variety of produce (e.g., potatoes, quinoa, corn, peppers) [66,67] (p.34), although further studies are needed to confirm the”

    From Andean landscape legacies: comprehensive remote sensing mapping and GIS analysis of long-term settlement and land use for sustainable futures (NW argentina) (2024) · cites this paper as [66]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brush, S. B.
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Published
1977-12-31
DOI
10.9783/9781512800982
Cited by
154
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review