Cited by 11Amazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeology and Natural HistoryArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Earthen Terrace Technologies and Environmental Adaptation in the Montane Forests of Pre-Columbian Northeastern Peru

Guengerich, Anna, Berquist, Stephen·2020·Journal of Field Archaeology

Abstract

The pre-Columbian Andes are renowned for agricultural terrace systems in areas of steep terrain. Most studies have concentrated on regions characterized by seasonally-variable limited precipitation, yet research in high-precipitation and cloud-forest regions of the North and Eastern Andes demonstrates the diversity of terrace technologies adapted to different landscapes. This paper presents research from survey, excavation, and digital modeling of three types of well-preserved agricultural terraces found in a 50 km2 area in central Chachapoyas, northeastern Peru. These terrace types—which we refer to as linear segmented, contour, and sinkhole—were all comprised entirely of earth, not stone. Results from digital modeling using ArcGIS hydrology tools indicate different manners through which each terrace type structured the movement of water over the ground surface, supporting previous arguments that similar earthen terrace infrastructure in Colombia, Ecuador, and eastern Peru were likewise designed to manage runoff drainage rather than support irrigation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00934690.2019.1702830

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Beach T., 1995, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 50, 138
  2. Bonavía D., 1968, Las Ruinas del Abiseo
  3. Bray W., 1987, Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region: Part II. Proceedings of the 45th International Congress of Amerianists, Bogota, Colombia, 443
  4. Church W., 2018, Parque Nacional Río Abiseo: Memoria viva del paisaje cultural andino amazónico, 274
  5. Church W., 2018, ¿Quiénes eran los chachapoya? Aproximaciones interdisciplinarias en el estudio de los Andes Nororientales. Tomo XXXVIII, Boletín de Arqueología, 5
  6. Cieza de León P., 1883, The Second Part of the Chronicle of Perú by Cieza de León
  7. Cook O. F., 1937, Revista Universitaria—Universidad de Cusco, 26, 205
  8. Denevan W., 1987, Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region: Part I: Proceedings of the 45th International Congress of Amerianists, Bogota, Colombia, 1
  9. Earle T., 1985, Prehistoric Intensive Agriculture in the Tropics, 569
  10. Erickson C., 1993, Research in Economic Anthropology: Economic Aspects of Water Management in the Prehispanic New World, 369
  11. Horkheimer H., 1973, Alimentación y Obtención de Alimentos en el Perú Prehispánico
  12. Isbell W., 1968, Archaeology, 21, 108
  13. Kendall A., 1997, The Restoration of Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Systems: Archaeology and Indigenous Technology and Rural Development
  14. Knapp G., 1987, Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region: Part II, Proceedings of the 45th International Congress of Amerianists, Bogota, Colombia, 403
  15. Kolata A., 1996, Tiwanaku and Its Hinterland: Archaeology and Paleoecology of an Andean Civilization, Vol.1, 109
  16. Kosiba S., 2018, Oxford Handbook of the Incas, 227
  17. Lennon Thomas, 1989, Boletín de Lima, 62, 43
  18. Murra J., 1972, Visita de la provincia de León de Huánuco en 1562, Iñigo Ortiz de Zuñiga, Visitador, Vol.2, 427
  19. Oliveira F., 2002, Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources, Volume 1, 55
  20. Parsons J., 1949, Antioqueño Colonization in Western Colombia. Ibero-Americana 32
  21. Rostain S., 2012, Islands in the Forest: Landscape Management in Pre-Columbian Amazonia
  22. Sarmiento de Gamboa P., 1907, History of the Incas
  23. Schjellerup I., 1985, Tools and Tillage, 5, 100
  24. Schjellerup I., 1989, Children of the Stones: Hijos de las piedras. A Report on the Agriculture in Chuquibamba, a District in North-Eastern Peru
  25. Sherbondy J., 1987, Revista Española de Antropología Americana
  26. Sherbondy J., 1987, Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region, 365
  27. Stanish J., 1987, Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region, 337
  28. Tang G., 2000, A Research on the Accuracy of Digital Elevation Models
  29. Toyne Marla, 2017, ¿Qué fue Chachapoyas? Aproximaciones Interdisciplinarias en el Estudio de los Andes Nororientales. Boletín de Arqueología, Tomo XXIII, 231
  30. Treacy J., 1993, Irrigation at High Altitudes: The Social Organization of Water Control Systems in the Andes, 99
  31. Troll C., 1958, Las Culturas Superiores Andinas y el Medio Geográfico: Monografías y Ensayos Geográficos, No. 1
  32. Williams L., 1990, Yearbook (Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, 16, 82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guengerich, A., & Berquist, S.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  • University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Venue
Journal of Field Archaeology
Published
2020-01-13
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
153-169
ISSN
  • 0093-4690 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-4582
OpenAlex
W2999243143
Cited by
11
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
18.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Field Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Archaeology and Natural History
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
agricultural terraces, pre-Columbian Andes, Chachapoyas, cloud forest, water management, landscape adaptation, hydrological modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review