The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Landscapes of Movement: Trails, Paths, and Roads in Anthropological Perspective
Abstract
The essays in this volume document trails, paths, and roads across different times and cultures, from those built by hunter-gatherers in the Great Basin of North America to causeway builders in the Bolivian Amazon to Bronze Age farms in the Near East, through aerial and satellite photography, surface survey, historical records, and excavation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Archaeology has long shown an interest in the study of roads, trails and paths.
“However, one could not claim the same with respect to archaeology, a discipline that has long shown an interest in the study of roads, trails and paths.”
From Roads and Anthropology: Ethnographic Perspectives on Space, Time and (Im)Mobility (2012) · cites this paper as Snead et al. 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roads and Anthropology: Ethnographic Perspectives on Space, Time and (Im)Mobility
DALAKOGLOU, D., & HARVEY, P. (2012) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.718426 · Cited by 289
The longue durée of andean movement networks: case study in the lauca altiplano
Saintenoy, T., Lima, P., Uribe, M., Carvajal, F., González, C., Crespo, M., Malvarez, M. F., Mendez-Quiros, P., Jofré, D., & González, F. (2025) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2025.2534236 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Publisher
- University of Pennsylvania Press
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
