The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of textile wastewater by Fenton’s process as a Advanced Oxidation Process
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the Fenton process exhibits a significant capability for removing COD, with an efficiency of 85% achieved at a pH of 3 [49,51].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Fenton process demonstrates a high level of effectiveness in removing color, with an efficiency of 98% achieved at a pH of 3.”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Notable catalysts that can be utilized include ferrous salts, Al 3+ , and Cu 2+ [49].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Perkowski Jan and Kos Lech (2002), "Treatment of textile dyeing wastewater by hydrogen peroxide and ferrous ions. The journal of fibres and textiles in Eastern Europe.
- Meric Sureyya, Kaptan Deniz, Olmez Tugba, (2004). Color and COD removal from wastewater containing reactive black 5 using Fenton"s oxidation process. The journal of Elsevier. Chemosphere 54, 435-441.
- Kang et al., (2002). Pre-oxidation and coagulation of textile wastewater by the Fenton process". The journal of Elsevier. Chemosphere 46, 923-928.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Student, M. T. (. S. A. T., D. Patil, A., & Raut, P. D. P. D.
- Venue
- IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology
- Publisher
- IOSR Journals
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 29-32
- ISSN
- 2319-2399
- 2319-2402
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
