Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perifollicular Xanthomatosis as the Hallmark of Axillary Fox-Fordyce Disease: An Evaluation of Histopathologic Features of 7 Cases

Open access
Bormate, Adolfo B., Leboit, Philip E., McCalmont, Timothy H.·2008·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fox-Fordyce disease (FFD) or apocrine miliaria is a rare condition with features that are characteristic clinically but not histopathologically. It is traditionally described as a condition that shows infundibular plugging, acanthosis, parakeratosis, spongiosis, and a nonspecific infiltrate. The so-called retention vesicle, which reputedly involves the apocrine duct, is often difficult to find. Recently, 4 uncontrolled observations were described (infundibular dyskeratotic cells, vacuolar alteration, cornoid lamella-like parakeratosis, and perifollicular foamy macrophages). In this study, we evaluated both established and new histopathologic criteria for the diagnosis of FFD and searched for other meaningful findings. OBSERVATIONS: Most established features were observed in both patients with FFD and control patients. All cases occurred during 1995 through 2005. No unequivocal retention vesicle was identifiable in any case. Infundibular vacuolar change and cornoid lamella-like parakeratosis were not corroborated as being diagnostically meaningful. Few dyskeratotic cells were seen in some patients with FFD and in control patients. Perifollicular foam cells were noted in most patients with FFD but not among control patients. These cells expressed CD68 but lacked expression of carcinoembryonic antigen, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15, and periodic acid-Schiff with diastase digestion. Perifollicular mucin, fibrosis, and mast cells in the infiltrate were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The established histopathologic attributes of FFD are nonspecific, and a retention vesicle is difficult to find even in level sections. In contrast, perifollicular foam cells are a distinct, relatively consistent, and specific feature of FFD. We contend that perifollicular foam cells represent a useful hallmark of FFD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.144.8.1020

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Bormate, A. B., Leboit, P. E., & McCalmont, T. H.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
144
Issue
8
Pages
1020
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108701948
Cited by
731
References
35
FWCI
36.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perifollicular Xanthomatosis as the Hallmark of Axillary Fox-Fordyce Disease: An Evaluation of Histopathologic Features of 7 Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.144.8.1020
The paper
Bormate, A. B., Leboit, P. E., & McCalmont, T. H. (2008). Perifollicular Xanthomatosis as the Hallmark of Axillary Fox-Fordyce Disease: An Evaluation of Histopathologic Features of 7 Cases. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.144.8.1020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.