Cited by 44Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

Free Cartilage Grafts and Healing by Secondary Intention: A Viable Reconstructive Combination After Excision of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in the Nasal Alar Region

van der Eerden, Paul A., Verdam, Froukje J., Dennis, Simon C. R., Vuyk, Hade·2009·Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

To assess the feasibility and outcome of free cartilage grafts left to heal by secondary intention in the reconstruction of nasal alar skin defects. We describe the retrospective analysis of 13 patients who were treated in a single department with the use of free cartilage grafts in combination with secondary intention healing for reconstruction of the alar subunit and lateral nasal wall defects after Mohs surgery for cutaneous cancer. Outcome measures included patient and surgeon satisfaction, alar retraction, cartilage extrusion, nasal valve collapse, revision rate, and time to healing. All wounds healed uneventfully by secondary intention, and the results were gauged as at least satisfactory by the patient and the surgeon. In 3 patients, minor aesthetic faults were evident; in 1 patient, the underlying cartilage was prominent and a hypertrophic scar also developed; in 1 patient, there was some alar notching; and in 1 other patient, a hypertrophic scar developed. One patient had a functional complaint of nasal blockage on the side that was surgically treated. Free cartilage implants in combination with secondary intention healing is a relatively simple, cost-effective, 1-stage technique. Our results demonstrate that this alternative reconstructive method is a viable option for small and deep defects of the alar subunit and the nasal sidewall of the nose. The donor site morbidity is limited to the ear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archfaci.2008.501

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Eerden, P. A., Verdam, F. J., Dennis, S. C. R., & Vuyk, H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Otolaryngology, Lange Land Hospital, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands (Dr van der Erden); Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Dr Verdam); Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, England (Dr Dennis); and Department of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Gooi-Noord Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands (Dr Vuyk).
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Venue
Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
18-23
ISSN
  • 1521-2491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3660
OpenAlex
W2116970189
Cited by
44
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
secondary intention healing, Mohs micrographic surgery, skin cancer, hypertrophic scars, nasal valve collapse, donor site morbidity, nasal reconstruction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Cartilage, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Retrospective Studies, Skin Neoplasms, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Mohs Surgery, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review