Cited by 39Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesEar and Head Tumors

Ear Reconstruction after Mohs cancer excision: lessons learned from 327 consecutive cases

Sanniec, Kyle, Harirah, Muhammad, Thornton, James F.·2019·Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lips provide key functional and aesthetic features of the face. From social interactions and speech to swallowing and oral competence, a functional dynamic structure is required. This interaction with surrounding landmarks presents a challenge for reconstruction. There are a myriad of ways reported to reconstruct these defects; however, as the authors' practice has evolved, a more refined approach was developed to optimize results and minimize the complexity of each patient's surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2004 to 2018 was performed of consecutive patients who underwent lip reconstruction following Mohs cancer resection performed by a single surgeon. Each case was evaluated for key patient characteristics, defect location, defect size, defect composition, reconstructive modality, and complications. In addition, the evolution of treatment types over those 14 years was evaluated. RESULTS: Six hundred fifteen patients underwent lip reconstruction. Defects most commonly involved the upper lateral lip, and 247 (40 percent) involved both the skin and vermillion. A significant majority of the patient's defects were repaired using either linear closure or V-wedge excision and closure. A complication rate of 10.2 percent (n = 63) was found, ranging from oral incompetence to cancer recurrence. There was no significant difference in complication rates in patients older than 75 years, in smokers, or in patients who were on anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' techniques have evolved from more invasive advancement and rotation flaps to a more reliable linear closure method over the past 14 years. This study shows that lip reconstruction is safe in elderly patients, smokers, and patients who are on anticoagulation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000005992

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Osteointegrated prostheses, costochondral implants, or polyethylene Medpor implants are the preferred methods to reconstruct near-total to total ear defects.

    “Osteointegrated prostheses, costochondral implants, or polyethylene Medpor (Stryker Corp., Kalamazoo, MI) implants are the preferred methods to reconstruct near-total to total ear defects.5,[34][35][36][37][38]”

    From Ear Reconstruction following Mohs Micrographic Surgery (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The present study demonstrated a variety of reconstruction options available for the auricular region, in addition to the frequent use of flaps and grafts, similarly to previous publications.

    “The present study demonstrated the variety of reconstruction options available for the auricular region, in addition to the frequent use of flaps and grafts, similarly to previous publications.10, 11”
  • With 0.99% infection and 6.93% minor complications (bleeding and partial graft necrosis), the authors' sample reproduces the types of adversities most often described in the literature.

    “With 0.99% of infection and 6.93% of minor complications (bleeding and partial graft necrosis), the authors’ sample reproduces the types of adversities most often described in the literature.10, 19”
  • Trephination can supply adequate vasculature in wound beds with exposed cartilage for the foundation and maintenance of FTSGs.

    “Trephination can supply adequate vasculature in wound beds with exposed cartilage for the foundation and maintenance of FTSGs.5”

    From Ear Reconstruction following Mohs Micrographic Surgery (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The superior third of the helix and antihelix are the most common locations affected by malignancies including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma.

    “The superior third of the helix and antihelix are the most common locations affected by malignancies including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma.5,6”

    From Ear Reconstruction following Mohs Micrographic Surgery (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanniec, K., Harirah, M., & Thornton, J. F.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2019-09
Volume
144
Issue
3
Pages
719-729
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962962594
Cited by
39
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ear and Head Tumors
Keywords
ear reconstruction, Mohs micrographic surgery, full-thickness skin graft, flap reconstruction, reconstruction complications, elderly patients, reconstruction algorithms
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Skin Neoplasms, Surgical Flaps, Mohs Surgery, Logistic Models, Skin Transplantation, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review