Cited by 136Primary Care and Health OutcomesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsInnovations in Medical Education

Comparison of dermatologic diagnoses by primary care practitioners and dermatologists: a review of the literature.

Federman, D. G.·1999·Archives of Family Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cost-containment efforts in the United States have led to a greater emphasis on health care delivery by primary care physicians as opposed to specialists, who are assumed to be more costly. With this approach, it is incumbent on the primary care physician to be able to accurately diagnose and treat common maladies, including skin disease. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether differences in performance were detectable between groups of physicians when presented with color slides or high-quality transparencies. DESIGN: We performed a critical review of published studies. RESULTS: Overall, dermatologists (93% correct) performed better than nondermatologists (52% correct) (P < .001). No difference was appreciable between dermatology residents (91% correct) and practicing dermatologists (96% correct) or between internal medicine residents (45% correct) and family practice residents (48% correct). In addition, family medicine attending physicians (70% correct) performed better than internal medicine attending physicians (52% correct) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians should receive more training in the diagnosis of skin disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archfami.8.2.170

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Federman, D. G.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Federman, D. G.
Venue
Archives of Family Medicine
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
170-172
ISSN
1063-3987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072629969
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
dermatological diagnosis, primary care physicians, dermatologists, diagnostic accuracy, physician specialty comparison, dermatology residents, family medicine residents, internal medicine residents, cost containment
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Dermatology, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Primary Health Care, Skin Diseases, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review