Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurocognitive Endophenotypes for Bipolar Disorder Identified in Multiplex Multigenerational Families

Open access
Glahn, David C., Almasy, Laura, Barguil, Marcela, Hare, Elizabeth, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Kent, Jack W., Dassori, Albana, Contreras, Javier, Pacheco, Adriana, Lanzagorta, Nuria, Nicolini, Humberto, Raventós, Henriette, Escamilla, Michael A.·2010·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although genetic influences on bipolar disorder are well established, localization of genes that predispose to the illness has proven difficult. Given that genes predisposing to bipolar disorder may be transmitted without expression of the categorical clinical phenotype, a strategy for identifying risk genes is to identify and map quantitative intermediate phenotypes or endophenotypes. OBJECTIVE: To adjudicate neurocognitive endophenotypes for bipolar disorder. DESIGN: All participants underwent diagnostic interviews and comprehensive neurocognitive evaluations. Neurocognitive measures found to be heritable were entered into analyses designed to determine which test results are impaired in affected individuals, are sensitive to the genetic liability for the illness, and are genetically correlated with affection status. SETTING: Central valley of Costa Rica; Mexico City, Mexico; and San Antonio, Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred nine Latino individuals participated in the study. Of these, 660 were members of extended pedigrees with at least 2 siblings diagnosed as having bipolar disorder (n = 230). The remaining subjects were community control subjects drawn from each site who did not have a personal or family history of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Neurocognitive test performance. RESULTS: Two of the 22 neurocognitive variables were not significantly heritable and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Patients with bipolar disorder were impaired on 6 cognitive measures compared with nonrelated healthy controls. Nonbipolar first-degree relatives were impaired on 5 of these, and the following 3 tests were genetically correlated with affection status: Digit Symbol Coding Task, Object Delayed Response Task, and immediate facial memory. CONCLUSION: This large-scale extended pedigree study of cognitive functioning in bipolar disorder identifies measures of processing speed, working memory, and declarative (facial) memory as candidate endophenotypes for bipolar disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.184

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Glahn, D. C., Almasy, L., Barguil, M., Hare, E., Peralta, J. M., Kent, J. W., Dassori, A., Contreras, J., Pacheco, A., Lanzagorta, N., Nicolini, H., Raventós, H., & Escamilla, M. A.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
168
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023202278
Cited by
205
References
11
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurocognitive Endophenotypes for Bipolar Disorder Identified in Multiplex Multigenerational Families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.184
The paper
Glahn, D. C., Almasy, L., Barguil, M., Hare, E., Peralta, J. M., Kent, J. W., Dassori, A., Contreras, J., Pacheco, A., Lanzagorta, N., Nicolini, H., Raventós, H., & Escamilla, M. A. (2010). Neurocognitive Endophenotypes for Bipolar Disorder Identified in Multiplex Multigenerational Families. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.