Cited by 1,368Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Price of Adaptation—Allostatic Load and Its Health Consequences: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging

Seeman, Teresa E.·1997·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exponential growth in the population of older adults presents clinicians with special concerns about factors affecting risks for declines in cognitive and physical functioning. OBJECTIVES: To examine the hypothesis that risks for such declines and for disease outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease, are related to differences in allostatic load, the cumulative physiologic toll exacted on the body over time by efforts to adapt to life experiences. To present an operational definition of allostatic load, along with preliminary evidence of its predictive validity in relation to salient outcomes of aging. METHODS: Data from a longitudinal, community-based study of successful aging were used to develop a measure of allostatic load based on 10 parameters reflecting levels of physiologic activity across a range of important regulatory systems. Allostatic load is the sum of the number of parameters for which the subject was rated in the highest-risk quartile. RESULTS: Higher allostatic load scores were associated with poorer cognitive and physical functioning and predicted larger decrements in cognitive and physical functioning as well as being associated with an increased risk for the incidence of cardiovascular disease, independent of sociodemographic and health status risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with the conceptualization of allostatic load as an index of wear and tear on the body, with elevations in allostatic load predicting an increased risk for a decline in cognitive and physical functioning as well as cardiovascular disease in a cohort of older men and women. From a clinical perspective, the concept of allostatic load may provide the basis for a more comprehensive assessment of major risks in the aging process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440400111013

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,368

Metadata

Authors
Seeman, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Seeman, Teresa E.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1997-10-27
Volume
157
Issue
19
Pages
2259
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052143620
Cited by
1,368
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 52
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG00586)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
allostatic load, successful aging, cognitive decline, cardiovascular risk, older adults, aging, aging biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review