Cited by 1,431Aging, Health, and DisabilityMedical Practices and RehabilitationRetirement, Disability, and Employment

An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States.

Nagi, Saad Z.·1976·The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of an epidemiological analysis of disability among adults in the noninstitutionalized continental United States population. Data were collected through interviews with a probability sample of persons 18 and over, yielding 6,493 completed schedules comprising 80.3 percent of the sample. Distinctions were made among concepts and indicators of pathology, impairment, individual performance, and social performance. Central to the analysis were two dimensions of individual performance (physical and emotional) and two dimensions of disability in social performance (work and independent living). A number of socio-demographic characteristics were included in the analysis. The results show the relative contributions of pathology and impairment to performance on the individual level, and the relative contributions of all of these factors on social performance, that is, the two dimensions of disability. Through pathology, impairment, performance at the individual level, and the socio-demographic characteristics, it was possible to account for 38 percent of the variance in work disability and 74 percent of dependence-independence in community living. Further explanations are given for variance in work disability. Estimates of the size of populations reporting varying types and severities of disability are also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3349677

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagi, S. Z.
Corresponding author
Nagi, Saad Z.
Venue
The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
439
ISSN
0160-1997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W174299725
Cited by
1,431
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 52
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Health and Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
disability epidemiology, adults, work disability, independent living, social performance, physical performance, emotional performance, impairment, pathology, sociodemographic factors, disability severity, disability prevalence, United States
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Dependency, Psychological, Educational Status, Epidemiologic Methods, Ethnicity, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Income, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, United States, Work Capacity Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review