The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Risk Factors and Impact on Survival of Feeding Tube Placement in Nursing Home Residents With Severe Cognitive Impairment
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The provision of artificial enteral nutrition to an aged person with severe cognitive impairment is a complex dilemma in the long-term care setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors and impact on survival of feeding tubes in nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study with 24-month follow-up using Minimum Data Set resident assessments on 1386 nursing home residents older than 65 years with recent progression to severe cognitive impairment in the state of Washington. Residents within this population who underwent feeding tube placement were identified. Clinical characteristics and survival for a period of 24 months were compared for residents who were and were not tube fed. RESULTS: Among the residents with recent progression to severe cognitive impairment, 9.7% underwent placement of a feeding tube. Factors independently associated with feeding tube placement included age younger than 87 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-2.78), aspiration (OR, 5.46; 95% CI, 2.66-11.20), swallowing problems (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.81-4.97), pressure ulcer (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.23-2.95), stroke (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.17-2.62), less baseline functional impairment (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.27-3.36), no do-not-resuscitate order (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.92-4.85), and no dementia (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.43-3.22). Survival did not differ between groups of residents with and without feeding tubes even after adjusting for independent risk factors for feeding tube placement. CONCLUSIONS: There are specific risk factors associated with feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. However, there is no survival benefit compared with similar residents who are not tube fed. These prognostic data are important for health care providers, families, and patients making decisions regarding enteral nutritional support in long-term care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kaw, M., & Sekas, G. (1994) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf02087416 · Cited by 194
Cited by
ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia
Volkert, D., Chourdakis, M., Faxen-Irving, G., Frühwald, T., Landi, F., Suominen, M. H., Vandewoude, M., Wirth, R., & Schneider, S. M. (2015) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.004 · Cited by 442
Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia
Sampson, E. L., Candy, B., & Jones, L. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007209.pub2 · Cited by 438
Mitchell, S. L., Teno, J. M., Roy, J., Kabumoto, G., & Mor, V. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.1.41 · Cited by 363
Self-citationS ARCOPENIA, W EIGHT L OSS, AND N UTRITIONAL F RAILTY IN THE E LDERLY
Bales, C. W., & Ritchie, C. S. (2002) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.010402.102715 · Cited by 346
Stratton, R. J., Ek, A.-C., Engfer, M., Moore, Z., Rigby, P., Wolfe, R., & Elia, M. (2005) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2005.03.005 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, S. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1997-02-10
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-327
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099481242
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Risk Factors and Impact on Survival of Feeding Tube Placement in Nursing Home Residents With Severe Cognitive Impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.157.3.327
- The paper
- Mitchell, S. L. (1997). The Risk Factors and Impact on Survival of Feeding Tube Placement in Nursing Home Residents With Severe Cognitive Impairment. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.157.3.327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.