The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blood Lead Levels and Mortality
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite declines in blood lead levels during the past 20 years, lead exposure continues to be a public health concern. Studies have linked lead exposure with increased risk for diverse health outcomes. Few studies have evaluated the association of lead exposure and mortality in the general population. METHODS: To evaluate the association of lead exposure and mortality in the United States, we used the recently released mortality follow-up data for participants of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a national cross-sectional survey of the general population conducted from 1976 to 1980. Survey participants aged 30 to 74 years with blood lead measurements were followed up through December 31, 1992 (n = 4292). RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, individuals with baseline blood lead levels of 20 to 29 microg/dL (1.0-1.4 micromol/L) had 46% increased all-cause mortality (rate ratio [RR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.86), 39% increased circulatory mortality (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.91), and 68% increased cancer mortality (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.02-2.78) compared with those with blood lead levels of less than 10 microg/dL (<0.5 micromol/L). All-cause mortality for those with blood lead levels of 10 to 19 microg/dL (0.5-0.9 micromol/L) was intermediately increased and not statistically significant (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.90-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with blood lead levels of 20 to 29 micro g/dL in 1976 to 1980 (15% of the US population at that time) experienced significantly increased all-cause, circulatory, and cardiovascular mortality from 1976 through 1992. Thus, we strongly encourage efforts to reduce lead exposure for occupationally exposed workers and the 1.7 million Americans with blood lead levels of at least 20 micro g/dL (> or = 1.0 micromol/L).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Picomolar concentrations of lead stimulate brain protein kinase C
Markovac, J., & Goldstein, G. W. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/334071a0 · Cited by 440
Cited by
Neurotoxic Effects and Biomarkers of Lead Exposure: A Review
Sanders, T., Liu, Y., Buchner, V., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2009) · Reviews on Environmental Health · doi:10.1515/reveh.2009.24.1.15 · Cited by 1,076
Chowdhury, R., Ramond, A., O’Keeffe, L. M., Shahzad, S., Kunutsor, S. K., Muka, T., Gregson, J., Willeit, P., Warnakula, S., Khan, H., et al. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k3310 · Cited by 638
Blood Lead Below 0.48 μmol/L (10 μg/dL) and Mortality Among US Adults
Menke, A., Muntner, P., Batuman, V., Silbergeld, E. K., & Guallar, E. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.628321 · Cited by 451
Self-citationBoskabady, M., Marefati, N., Farkhondeh, T., Shakeri, F., Farshbaf, A., & Boskabady, M. H. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.013 · Cited by 451
Mechanisms of lead-induced hypertension and cardiovascular disease
Vaziri, N. D. (2008) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00158.2008 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Lustberg, M., & Silbergeld, E.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-11-25
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2443
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064885200
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Lead Levels and Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.162.21.2443
- The paper
- Lustberg, M., & Silbergeld, E. (2002). Blood Lead Levels and Mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.21.2443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.