The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Posthospital Medication Discrepancies: Prevalence and Contributing Factors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the national attention being given to the problem of medication safety, little attention has been paid to the medication problems that are encountered by older patients who are receiving care across settings. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and contributing factors associated with posthospital medication discrepancies. METHODS: The study population consisted of community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older admitted to the hospital with 1 of 9 selected conditions (n = 375). A geriatric nurse practitioner performed a comprehensive medication assessment in the patient's home within 24 to 72 hours after institutional discharge. The assessment focused on what older patients reported taking in comparison with the prehospital medication regimen and the posthospital medication regimen. Prevalence and types of medication discrepancies were categorized using the Medication Discrepancy Tool. RESULTS: A total of 14.1% of patients experienced 1 or more medication discrepancies. Using the Medication Discrepancy Tool, 50.8% of identified contributing factors for discrepancies were categorized as patient-associated, and 49.2% were categorized as system-associated. Five medication classes accounted for half of all medication discrepancies. Medication discrepancies were associated with the total number of medications taken and the presence of congestive heart failure. A total of 14.3% of the patients who experienced medication discrepancies were rehospitalized at 30 days compared with 6.1% of the patients who did not experience a discrepancy (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of older patients experienced medication discrepancies after making the transition from hospital to home. Both patient-associated and system-associated solutions may be needed to ensure medication safety during this vulnerable period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Care Transitions Intervention: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Coleman, E. A., Parry, C., Chalmers, S., & Min, S.-J. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1822 · Cited by 1,937
Self-citation16., O. B. O. T. A. D. Q. I. W., Chawla, L. S., Bellomo, R., Bihorac, A., Goldstein, S. L., Siew, E. D., Bagshaw, S. M., Bittleman, D., Cruz, D., Endre, Z., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2017.2 · Cited by 1,537
Medication Adherence: Its Importance in Cardiovascular Outcomes
Ho, P. M., Bryson, C. L., & Rumsfeld, J. S. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.768986 · Cited by 1,488
Mekonnen, A. B., McLachlan, A. J., & Brien, J.-A. E. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/jcpt.12364 · Cited by 309
Munshi, M. N., Florez, H., Huang, E. S., Kalyani, R. R., Mupanomunda, M., Pandya, N., Swift, C. S., Taveira, T. H., & Haas, L. B. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-2512 · Cited by 243
Interventions to Improve Transitional Care Between Nursing Homes and Hospitals: A Systematic Review
LaMantia, M. A., Scheunemann, L. P., Viera, A. J., Busby‐Whitehead, J., & Hanson, L. C. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02776.x · Cited by 189
Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care – a review of the evidence
Laugaland, K., Aase, K., & Barach, P. (2012) · WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/wor-2012-0544-2915 · Cited by 184
Boyd, C. M., Reider, L., Frey, K., Scharfstein, D., Leff, B., Wolff, J., Groves, C., Karm, L., Wegener, S., Marsteller, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1192-5 · Cited by 159
Medication Discrepancies upon Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility Transitions
Tjia, J., Bonner, A., Briesacher, B. A., McGee, S., Terrill, E., & Miller, K. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0948-2 · Cited by 109
Carpenter, D. M., DeVellis, R. F., Fisher, E. B., DeVellis, B. M., Hogan, S. L., & Jordan, J. M. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.006 · Cited by 110
Waring, J., Marshall, F., Bishop, S., Sahota, O., Walker, M., Currie, G., Fisher, R., & Avery, T. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02290 · Cited by 104
Jennings, J. H., Thavarajah, K., Mendez, M. P., Eichenhorn, M., Kvale, P., & Yessayan, L. (2015) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.14-1123 · Cited by 89
Post-discharge intervention in vulnerable, chronically ill patients.
Kansagara, D., Ramsay, R. S., Labby, D., & Saha, S. (2012) · Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.1002/jhm.941 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, E. A., Smith, J. D., Raha, D., & Min, S.-J.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-09-12
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1842
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121242948
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.