Cited by 89Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Predischarge Bundle for Patients With Acute Exacerbations of COPD to Reduce Readmissions and ED Visits

Jennings, Jeffrey H., Thavarajah, Krishna, Mendez, Michael P., Eichenhorn, Michael, Kvale, Paul, Yessayan, Lenar·2015·Chest

Abstract

Background Hospital readmissions for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) pose burdens to the health-care system and patients. A current gap in knowledge is whether a predischarge screening and educational tool administered to patients with COPD reduces readmissions and ED visits.Methods A single-center, randomized trial of admitted patients with AECOPDs was conducted at Henry Ford Hospital between February 2010 and April 2013. One hundred seventy-two patients were randomized to either the control (standard care) or the bundle group in which patients received smoking cessation counseling, screening for gastroesophageal reflux disease and depression or anxiety, standardized inhaler education, and a 48-h postdischarge telephone call. The primary end point was the difference in the composite risk of hospitalizations or ED visits for AECOPD between the two groups in the 30 days following discharge. A secondary end point was 90-day readmission rate.Results Of the 172 patients, 18 of 79 in the control group (22.78%) and 18 of 93 in the bundle group (19.35%) were readmitted within 30 days. The risk of ED visits or hospitalizations within 30 days was not different between the groups (risk difference, -3.43%; 95% CI, -15.68% to 8.82%; P = .58). Overall, the time to readmission in 30 and 90 days was similar between groups (log-rank test P = .71 and .88, respectively).Conclusions A predischarge bundle intervention in AECOPD is not sufficient to reduce the 30-day risk of hospitalizations or ED visits. More resources may be needed to generate a measurable effect on readmission rates.Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02135744; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.14-1123

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jennings, J. H., Thavarajah, K., Mendez, M. P., Eichenhorn, M., Kvale, P., & Yessayan, L.
Affiliations
Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Jennings, Jeffrey H.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
147
Issue
5
Pages
1227-1234
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1560264663
Cited by
89
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
COPD exacerbations, hospital readmission, emergency department visits, smoking cessation counseling, inhaler education, COPD education
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Disease Progression, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Patient Care Bundles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review