Cited by 189Hospital Admissions and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Interventions to Improve Transitional Care Between Nursing Homes and Hospitals: A Systematic Review

Open access
LaMantia, Michael A., Scheunemann, Leslie P., Viera, Anthony J., Busby‐Whitehead, Jan, Hanson, Laura C.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Transitions between healthcare settings are associated with errors in communication of information and treatment plans for frail older patients, but strategies to improve transitional care are lacking. A systematic review was conducted to identify and evaluate interventions to improve communication of accurate and appropriate medication lists and advance directives for elderly patients who transition between nursing homes and hospitals. MEDLINE, ISI Web, and EBSCO Host (from inception to June 2008) were searched for original, English‐language research articles reporting interventions to improve communication of medication lists and advance directives. Five studies ultimately met all inclusion criteria. Two described interventions that enhanced transmission of advance directives, two described interventions that improved communication of medication lists, and one intervention addressed both goals. One study was a randomized controlled trial, whereas the remaining studies used historical or no controls. Study results indicate that a standardized patient transfer form may assist with the communication of advance directives and medication lists and that pharmacist‐led review of medication lists may help identify omitted or indicated medications on transfer. Although preliminary evidence supports adoption of these methods to improve transitions between nursing home and hospital, further research is needed to define target populations and outcomes measures for high‐quality transitional care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02776.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaMantia, M. A., Scheunemann, L. P., Viera, A. J., Busby‐Whitehead, J., & Hanson, L. C.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
777-782
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1584798222
Cited by
189
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (T32AG000272)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
care transitions, nursing homes, hospital discharge, advance directives, medication lists, frail elderly patients, pharmacist medication review
MeSH terms
Aged, Communication Barriers, Continuity of Patient Care, Drug Therapy, Hospitals, Humans, Nursing Homes, Patient Discharge, Patient Transfer, Research Design, Advance Directives, Frail Elderly, Total Quality Management, Patient-Centered Care, Medical Errors, Evidence-Based Practice, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review