Cited by 345Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Toward Shared Decision Making at the End of Life in Intensive Care Units: Opportunities for Improvement

White, Douglas B.·2007·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In North America, families generally wish to be involved in end-of-life decisions when the patient cannot participate, yet little is known about the extent to which shared decision making occurs in intensive care units. METHODS: We audiotaped 51 physician-family conferences about major end-of-life treatment decisions at 4 hospitals from August 1, 2000, to July 31, 2002. We measured shared decision making using a previously validated instrument to assess the following 10 elements: discussing the nature of the decision, describing treatment alternatives, discussing the pros and cons of the choices, discussing uncertainty, assessing family understanding, eliciting patient values and preferences, discussing the family's role in decision making, assessing the need for input from others, exploring the context of the decision, and eliciting the family's opinion about the treatment decision. We used a mixed-effects regression model to determine predictors of shared decision making and to evaluate whether higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction. RESULTS: Only 2% (1/51) of decisions met all 10 criteria for shared decision making. The most frequently addressed elements were the nature of the decision (100%) and the context of the decision to be made (92%). The least frequently addressed elements were the family's role in decision making (31%) and an assessment of the family's understanding of the decision (25%). In multivariate analysis, lower family educational level was associated with less shared decision making (partial correlation coefficient, 0.34; standardized beta, .3; P = .02). Higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction with communication (partial correlation coefficient, 0.15; standardized beta, .09; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Shared decision making about end-of-life treatment choices was often incomplete, especially among less educated families. Higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction. Shared decision making may be an important area for quality improvement in intensive care units.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.167.5.461

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, D. B.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
White, Douglas B.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2007-03-12
Volume
167
Issue
5
Pages
461
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063765803
Cited by
345
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 28
FWCI
19.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1k12hd049077-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24 HL68593, K24HL068593)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NR05226, R01NR005226)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12-HD049077)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
shared decision-making, end-of-life care, intensive care unit, family involvement in treatment decisions, family satisfaction, family educational level, patient values and preferences
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Life Support Care, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional-Family Relations, Terminal Care, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review