The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Missed Opportunities for Interval Empathy in Lung Cancer Communication
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Empathy is important in patient-physician communication and is associated with improved patient satisfaction and adherence to physicians' recommendations. METHODS: To evaluate empathic opportunities and physician responses, we conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of 20 audiorecorded, transcribed consultations between patients with lung cancer and their thoracic surgeons or oncologists, from a larger observational study of 137 patients in a Veterans Affairs hospital in the southern United States. Using qualitative analysis, we collaboratively developed themes and subthemes until saturation. Then, each transcript was coded, using grounded theory methods, until consensus was achieved, counting and sequentially analyzing patient empathic opportunities and physician responses. RESULTS: Subthemes regarding patients' statements about lung cancer included (1) morbidity or mortality concerns, (2) cancer-related symptoms, (3) relationship to smoking, (4) decisions about treatment, (5) beliefs about or mistrust of medical care, (6) factors limiting ability to treat cancer, and (7) confusion regarding cancer status and treatment. We identified 384 empathic opportunities and found that physicians had responded empathically to 39 (10%) of them. Otherwise, physicians provided little emotional support, often shifting to biomedical questions and statements. We defined this phenomenon as missed opportunities for "interval empathy." When empathy was provided, 50% of these statements occurred in the last one-third of the encounter, whereas patients' concerns were evenly raised throughout the encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians rarely responded empathically to the concerns raised by patients with lung cancer, and empathic responses that did occur were more frequently in the last third of the encounter. Our results may provide a typologic approach to help physicians recognize empathic opportunities and with further development may aid in improving physicians' communication skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919
Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030 · Cited by 1,687
Fallowfield, L., Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., Saul, J., Duffy, A., & Eves, R. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07810-8 · Cited by 854
Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study
Chapple, A., Ziebland, S., & McPherson, A. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7c · Cited by 789
Cited by
Azzoli, C. G., Baker, S., Temin, S., Pao, W., Aliff, T., Brahmer, J., Johnson, D. H., Laskin, J. L., Masters, G., Milton, D., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.5622 · Cited by 915
Assessing empathy development in medical education: a systematic review
Sulzer, S. H., Feinstein, N. W., & Wendland, C. L. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12806 · Cited by 294
A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care
Lelorain, S., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., & Sultan, S. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2115 · Cited by 289
Evidence‐based treatment of depression in patients with cancer
Li, M., Fitzgerald, P., & Rodin, G. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.7372 · Cited by 236
Medical students’ understanding of empathy: a phenomenological study
Tavakol, S., Dennick, R., & Tavakol, M. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04152.x · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Morse, D. S., Edwardsen, E. A., & Gordon, H. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-09-22
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1853
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117769521
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Missed Opportunities for Interval Empathy in Lung Cancer Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.168.17.1853
- The paper
- Morse, D. S., Edwardsen, E. A., & Gordon, H. S. (2008). Missed Opportunities for Interval Empathy in Lung Cancer Communication. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.17.1853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.