The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking.
Abstract
In the spring of 1958 six scientists gathered at the University of Colorado to consider the problem of creative thinking, its conditions, and how it can be fostered. The participants of this symposium were Jerome Bruner of Harvard, Richard Crutchfield of the University of California, Mary Henle of the New School for Social Research, Robert MacLeod of Cornell, David McClelland of Harvard, and Herbert Simon of the Carnegie Institute. This symposium was a sequel to an earlier one, published asContemporary Approaches to Cognitionin 1957. This group of distinguished behavioral scientists presented a provocative, objective, penetrating analysis of one of today's most pressing problems: human creativity. Creativity varies in degree and kind. It is apparent that there is a kinship between creativity of everyday life and that of a great scientist. That which is unique in this continuum is not the product but the creative process. The process and
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
The standard definition of creativity
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 · Cited by 3,895
Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.
Amabile, T. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997 · Cited by 2,278
The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour
Duncan, J. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004 · Cited by 1,846
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.7.677 · Cited by 874
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41330806 · Cited by 738
Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00879.x · Cited by 669
Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008 · Cited by 611
The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain
Duncan, J. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.015 · Cited by 471
Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.02.002 · Cited by 329
Treffinger, D. J., Selby, E. C., & Isaksen, S. G. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.007 · Cited by 180
Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410701397164 · Cited by 151
When is a Tool a Tool? User Perceptions of System Agency in Human–AI Co-Creative Drawing
Lawton, T., Grace, K., & Ibarrola, F. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3595977 · Cited by 72
Hsueh, S., Ciolfi Felice, M., Alaoui, S. F., & Mackay, W. E. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642854 · Cited by 33
Designing for Creativity in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
Farooq, U., Carroll, J. M., & Canoe, C. H. (2008) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/jec.2008100104 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Lunsky, L. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1963-08-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028414107
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
