Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 727

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stimulus Generalization.

Mandriota, F. J.·1966·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

The empirical concept of stimulus generalization refers to the obvious but highly complex fact that conditioned behavior is displayed to stimuli which have never been presented in conditioning. That stimuli other than the conditioned stimulus will elicit a conditioned response does not require elaborate laboratory demonstration. It is evident when teaching a child vocabulary or when training a dog to fetch. A great deal of laboratory work has been done, however, to specify the phenomenon in detail. This book contains much of that work. As Professor Mostofsky states in his preface, the book is neither a collection of theoretical arguments nor a comprehensive review of the empirical work, it samples both. Of the 22 papers in the book, nine are primarily conceptual or theoretical and in behavioral terms and eleven primarily report behavioral experiments. Only one paper focuses on the neural basis of stimulus generalization, and it is supported by

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1966.00470080112018

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 727

Metadata

Authors
Mandriota, F. J.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1966-02-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
228-229
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4232838057
Cited by
727
References
0
FWCI
30.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulus Generalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470080112018
The paper
Mandriota, F. J. (1966). Stimulus Generalization. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470080112018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.