Cited by 437Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesMedia Influence and Health

Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning, and self‐regulation

Open access
Sniehotta, Falko F.·2009·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Purpose Briefly review the current state of theorizing about volitional behaviour change and identification of challenges and possible solutions for future theory development. Method Review of the literature and theoretical analysis. Results Reasoned action theories have made limited contributions to the science of behaviour change as they do not propose means of changing cognitions or account for existing effective behaviour change techniques. Changing beliefs does not guarantee behaviour change. The implementation intentions (IMPs) approach to planning has advanced theorizing but the applications to health behaviours often divert substantially from the IMPs paradigm with regard to interventions, effects, mediators and moderators. Better construct definitions and differentiations are needed to make further progress in integrating theory and understanding behaviour change. Conclusions Further progress in theorizing can be achieved by (a) disentangling planning constructs to study their independent and joint effects on behaviour, (b) progressing research on moderators and mediators of planning effects outside the laboratory and (c) integrating planning processes within learning theory and self‐regulation theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/135910708x389042

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When behaviour is the outcome, early causal-chain endpoints such as knowledge and attitudes are not enough, because their effects are weakened as they pass through motivational and action processes.

    “However, when the outcome is behaviour, end-points that are early in the causal chain, such as knowledge and attitudes, are insufficient, as even a strong effect on these cognitive outcomes will be attenuated as they are mediated through motivational and action-oriented processes to result in behaviour (Sniehotta, 2009;Webb & Sheeran, 2006).”
  • Other empirical work from the psychology literature has demonstrated the value of action-plans with respect to improving the effectiveness of feedback.

    “Other empirical work from the psychology literature has demonstrated the value of action‐plans with respect to improving the effectiveness of feedback (Sniehotta 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sniehotta, F. F.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Sniehotta, Falko F.
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
261-273
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W2019130599
Cited by
437
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
implementation intentions, planning, self-regulation, theory of reasoned action, health behavior change, behaviour change techniques, belief revision, learning theory
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Psychological Theory, Social Control, Informal, Health Behavior, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review