The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representation of Structure in Similarity Data: Problems and Prospects
Abstract
Conclusion: After struggling with the problem of representing structure in similarity data for over 20 years, I find that a number of challenging problems still remain to be overcome—even in the simplest case of the analysis of a single symmetric matrix of similarity estimates. At the same time, I am more optimistic than ever that efforts directed toward surmounting the remaining difficulties will reap both methodological and substantive benefits. The methodological benefits that I forsee include both an improved efficiency and a deeper understanding of “discovery” methods of data analysis. And the substantive benefits should follow, through the greater leverage that such methods will provide for the study of complex empirical phenomena—perhaps particularly those characteristic of the human mind.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis
Kruskal, J. B. (1964) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289565 · Cited by 7,317
Hierarchical Clustering Schemes
Johnson, S. C. (1967) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289588 · Cited by 4,897
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method
Kruskal, J. B. (1964) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289694 · Cited by 4,846
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310791 · Cited by 4,678
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
Principles of Numerical Taxonomy
(2013) · Personality Structure and Measurement (Psychology Revivals) · doi:10.4324/9780203766804-11 · Cited by 2,990
Torgerson, W. S. (1958) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,920
The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function. I.
Shepard, R. N. (1962) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289630 · Cited by 2,550
Self-citationMacIntyre, A., & Levi-Strauss, C. (1967) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217471 · Cited by 2,473
Cited by
Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · Cited by 21,392
Tversky, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.4.327 · Cited by 7,414
Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science
Shepard, R. N. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3629243 · Cited by 2,416
Self-citationSocial Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226141 · Cited by 2,097
Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences
Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x · Cited by 1,801
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepard, R. N.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1974-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-421
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2052167135
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 22.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representation of Structure in Similarity Data: Problems and Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02291665
- The paper
- Shepard, R. N. (1974). Representation of Structure in Similarity Data: Problems and Prospects. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.