Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remyelinated Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Magnetic Resonance Image Appearance

Open access
Barkhof, Frederik, Brück, Wolfgang, De Groot, Corline J. A., Bergers, Elisabeth, Hulshof, Sandra, Geurts, Jeroen, Polman, Chris H., van der Valk, Paul·2003·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various types of pathologic mechanisms in multiple sclerosis (MS) can alter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signals, and the appearance of remyelinated lesions on MRI is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the MRI appearance of remyelinated lesions in MS. DESIGN: Comparison of postmortem MRI findings with histopathologic findings. SETTING: Brain donations from a general community. Patients Magnetic resonance images from 36 rapid autopsies yielded 161 areas that could be matched with histologic characteristics, including 149 focal T2-weighted abnormalities, with a range of signal intensities on T1-weighted images. In a subset of 49 lesions, magnetization transfer ratio could be determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An observer blinded to the MRI findings assessed the presence of remyelination using light microscopic criteria; in 25 areas, in situ hybridization was used to assess the presence of oligodendrocytes expressing proteolipid protein messenger RNA. RESULTS: Remyelinated areas were found in 67 lesions (42%): partial remyelination was present in 30 lesions (19%), whereas 37 lesions (23%) were fully remyelinated. Remyelinated lesions contained enhanced numbers of oligodendrocytes containing proteolipid protein messenger RNA. All areas with remyelination shown histopathologically were hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Strong hypointensity on T1-weighted images was significantly associated (chi2 = 29.8, P<.001) with demyelinated and partially remyelinated lesions compared with fully remyelinated lesions. The magnetization transfer ratio of remyelinated lesions (mean [SD], 27.6% [41%]) differed (F = 46.3, P<.001) from both normal-appearing white matter (35.2% [32%]) and demyelinated lesions (22.3% [48%]). CONCLUSIONS: Remyelinated lesions return an abnormal signal on T2-weighted images. Both T1-weighted images and magnetization transfer ratio may have (limited) additional value in separating lesions with and without remyelination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1073

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Barkhof, F., Brück, W., De Groot, C. J. A., Bergers, E., Hulshof, S., Geurts, J., Polman, C. H., & van der Valk, P.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
1073
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113012066
Cited by
328
References
6
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remyelinated Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Magnetic Resonance Image Appearance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.60.8.1073
The paper
Barkhof, F., Brück, W., De Groot, C. J. A., Bergers, E., Hulshof, S., Geurts, J., Polman, C. H., & van der Valk, P. (2003). Remyelinated Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Magnetic Resonance Image Appearance. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.8.1073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.