Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statin Use and the Risk of Incident Dementia: The Cardiovascular Health Study

Rea, Thomas D., Breitner, John C., Psaty, Bruce M., Fitzpatrick, Annette L., Lopez, Oscar L., Newman, Anne B., Hazzard, William R., Zandi, Peter P., Burke, Gregory L., Lyketsos, Constantine G., Bernick, Charles, Kuller, Lewis H.·2005·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) reduce cardiovascular risk through mechanisms that might affect the development of dementia. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether statin use is associated with a lower risk of dementia compared with never use of lipid-lowering agents (LLAs). DESIGN: Cohort study of community-dwelling adults 65 years and older. The analysis included 2798 participants free of dementia at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we estimated the risk of incident all-cause and type-specific dementia associated with time-dependent statin therapy compared with never use of LLAs. The primary analyses incorporated a 1-year lag between exposure and outcome. Secondary analyses included the final year of exposure and modeled statin use as current use vs nonuse to simulate a case-control approach. RESULTS: Compared with never use of LLAs, ever use of statins was not associated with the risk of all-cause dementia (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.52), Alzheimer disease alone (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.76-1.91), mixed Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.44-1.72), or vascular dementia alone (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.61-3.06). In contrast, in secondary analyses, current use of statins compared with nonuse of LLAs was associated with HRs of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.46-1.02) for all-cause dementia and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.35-0.92) for any Alzheimer disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, statin therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of dementia. Methodological differences may explain why results of this cohort investigation differ from those of prior case-control studies. Additional investigation is needed to determine whether and for whom statin use may affect dementia risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.62.7.1047

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Rea, T. D., Breitner, J. C., Psaty, B. M., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Lopez, O. L., Newman, A. B., Hazzard, W. R., Zandi, P. P., Burke, G. L., Lyketsos, C. G., Bernick, C., & Kuller, L. H.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
62
Issue
7
Pages
1047
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098878950
Cited by
277
References
3
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statin Use and the Risk of Incident Dementia: The Cardiovascular Health Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.7.1047
The paper
Rea, T. D., Breitner, J. C., Psaty, B. M., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Lopez, O. L., Newman, A. B., Hazzard, W. R., Zandi, P. P., Burke, G. L., Lyketsos, C. G., Bernick, C., & Kuller, L. H. (2005). Statin Use and the Risk of Incident Dementia: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.7.1047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.