Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognosis of Parkinson Disease: Risk of Dementia and Mortality: The Rotterdam Study

de Lau, Lonneke M. L., Schipper, C. Maarten A., Hofman, Albert, Koudstaal, Peter J., Breteler, Monique M. B.·2005·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most prognostic studies on Parkinson disease have been hospital based or have applied register-based case-finding methods. Potential under-representation of mild cases may have given biased results. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether Parkinson disease is associated with an increased risk of dementia and death. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. Parkinson disease and dementia were assessed through in-person examination at baseline (1990-1993) and 2 follow-up visits (1993-1994 and 1997-1999). Computerized linkage to medical and municipality records provided additional information on disease outcomes and mortality. SETTING: General population. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6969 participants, including 99 prevalent and 67 incident cases of Parkinson disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident dementia and death. Adjusted hazard ratios were calculated through Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with Parkinson disease had an increased risk of dementia (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.4), which was especially pronounced in participants carrying at least 1 apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) epsilon2 allele (13.5; 4.5-40.6). Parkinson disease was associated with an increased mortality risk (1.8; 1.5-2.3). The association consistently diminished when analyses were sequentially restricted to patients with shorter disease duration and after adjustment for the occurrence of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Especially patients with Parkinson disease who carry an APOE epsilon2 allele have an increased risk of developing dementia. Increased mortality risk in Parkinson disease is dependent on disease duration and is only modest in the absence of dementia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.62.8.1265

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
de Lau, L. M. L., Schipper, C. M. A., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., & Breteler, M. M. B.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
62
Issue
8
Pages
1265
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171150570
Cited by
211
References
1
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis of Parkinson Disease: Risk of Dementia and Mortality: The Rotterdam Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.8.1265
The paper
de Lau, L. M. L., Schipper, C. M. A., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2005). Prognosis of Parkinson Disease: Risk of Dementia and Mortality: The Rotterdam Study. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.8.1265

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.