The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndrome in the PNS Euronetwork Database: A European Study From 20 Centers
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) represents the remote effects of cancer on the nervous system. Diagnostic criteria for the syndrome were published by the PNS Euronetwork and form the basis of a database to collect standardized clinical data from patients with PNS. OBJECTIVES: To analyze various types of PNS, frequent tumor and antibody associations, clinical characteristics of individual syndromes, and possible therapeutic and prognostic strategies. DESIGN: Prospective case series and database study. SETTING: Twenty European centers. Patients Patients were recruited from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Based on diagnostic criteria published by the PNS Euronetwork consortium, clinical characteristics of classic PNS and several other less well-characterized syndromes associated with cancer were assessed. RESULTS: Data from 979 patients were analyzed, representing the largest PNS investigation to date. The findings elucidate the clinical evolution of paraneoplastic cerebellar syndrome according to the onconeural antibodies present, the heterogeneity and prognosis of dysautonomic disorders, and the clinical variability of paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis. CONCLUSION: The study results confirm that PNS influences oncologic patient survival. Tumors are the main cause of death, but some types of PNS (such as dysautonomia) have a poorer prognosis than malignant neoplasms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies
Dalmau, J., Gleichman, A. J., Hughes, E. G., Rossi, J. E., Peng, X., Lai, M., Dessain, S. K., Rosenfeld, M. R., Balice-Gordon, R., & Lynch, D. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70224-2 · Cited by 3,488
Lucchinetti, C. F., Kimmel, D. W., & Lennon, V. A. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.3.652 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes
Graus, F., Vogrig, A., Muñiz-Castrillo, S., Antoine, J.-C. G., Desestret, V., Dubey, D., Giometto, B., Irani, S. R., Joubert, B., Leypoldt, F., et al. (2021) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000001014 · Cited by 759
Self-citationConnelly‐Smith, L., Alquist, C. R., Aqui, N. A., Hofmann, J. C., Klingel, R., Onwuemene, O. A., Patriquin, C. J., Pham, H. P., Sanchez, A. P., Schneiderman, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22043 · Cited by 684
Zuliani, L., Graus, F., Giometto, B., Bien, C., & Vincent, A. (2012) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-301237 · Cited by 293
Self-citationParaneoplastic neuropathy: wide-ranging clinicopathological manifestations
Koike, H., Tanaka, F., & Sobue, G. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32834a87b7 · Cited by 105
Tannoury, J., de Mestier, L., Hentic, O., Ruszniewski, P., Créange, A., & Sobhani, I. (2021) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000506400 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Giometto, B.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 330
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055500800
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndrome in the PNS Euronetwork Database: A European Study From 20 Centers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneurol.2009.341
- The paper
- Giometto, B. (2010). Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndrome in the PNS Euronetwork Database: A European Study From 20 Centers. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
