The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Periods and Amblyopia
Abstract
During the past 20 years, basic science has shown that there are different critical periods for different visual functions during the development of the visual system. Visual functions processed at higher anatomical levels within the system have a later critical period than functions processed at lower levels. This general principle suggests that treatments for amblyopia should be followed in a logical sequence, with treatment for each visual function to be started before its critical period is over. However, critical periods for some visual functions, such as stereopsis, are not yet fully determined, and the optimal treatment is, therefore, unknown. This article summarizes the current extent of our knowledge and points to the gaps that need to be filled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys
Le Vay, S., Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901910102 · Cited by 1,123
Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation.
Shatz, C. J., & Stryker, M. P. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012421 · Cited by 691
The effect of dark rearing on the time course of the critical period in cat visual cortex
Mower, G. D. (1991) · Developmental Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0165-3806(91)90001-y · Cited by 220
Cited by
Hensch, T. K. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144327 · Cited by 1,300
Synapse elimination and indelible memory
Lichtman, J. W., & Colman, H. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80893-4 · Cited by 380
HENSCH, T. K., & QUINLAN, E. M. (2018) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523817000219 · Cited by 206
The Puzzle of Visual Development: Behavior and Neural Limits
Kiorpes, L. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2937-16.2016 · Cited by 112
Synaptic dynamism measured over minutes to months: Age-dependent decline in an autonomic ganglion
Gan, W.-B., Kwon, E., Feng, G., Sanes, J. R., & Lichtman, J. W. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1115 · Cited by 84
The effect of bangerter filters on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with external noise
Zhang, P., Wang, H., Ren, W., Guo, H., Yang, J., Tao, J., Yang, Z., Li, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.804576 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Daw, N. W.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 502
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969201869
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
