The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence of Glaucoma in a Population-Based Study of Hispanic Subjects: Proyecto VER
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based sample of Hispanic adults older than 40 years. METHODS: Using 1990 census data for Arizona, groups of persons living in sections of the city in Nogales and Tucson were randomly selected with a probability proportional to the Hispanic population older than 40 years. We tried to recruit all eligible adults in homes with 1 self-described Hispanic adult. Detailed ocular examinations at a local clinic included visual acuity testing, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, an optic disc evaluation, and a threshold visual field test. Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) was defined using a proposed international system for prevalence surveys, including threshold visual field defect and optic disc damage. Angle-closure glaucoma was defined as bilateral appositional angle closure, combined with optic nerve damage (judged by field and disc as for OAG). RESULTS: Examinations were conducted in 72% (4774/6658) of eligible persons, with a 1.97% prevalence (95% confidence interval, 1.58%-2.36%) of OAG (94 persons). The age-specific OAG prevalence increased nonlinearly from 0.50% in those aged 41 to 49 years to 12.63% in those 80 years and older. Angle-closure glaucoma was detected in 5 persons (0.10%). Sex, blood pressure, and cigarette smoking were not significant OAG risk factors. Only 36 (38%) of the 94 persons with OAG were aware of their OAG before the study. Screening results with an intraocular pressure higher than 22 mm Hg (in the eye with a higher pressure) would miss 80% of the OAG cases. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OAG in Hispanic persons was intermediate between reported values for white and black persons. The prevalence increased more quickly with increasing age than in other ethnic groups. Glaucoma was the leading cause of bilateral blindness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
Self-citationThe definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 · Cited by 2,365
Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Sponsel, W. E., Franke, T., Cantor, L. B., Martone, J., & Menage, M. J. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31774-9 · Cited by 967
Prevalence of Open-angle Glaucoma in Australia
Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Attebo, K., & Healey, P. R. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30449-1 · Cited by 959
Racial Variations in the Prevalence of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey
Tielsch, J. M. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470030069026 · Cited by 879
Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma The Egna-Neumarkt Study
Bonomi, L. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00138-x · Cited by 728
The Barbados Eye Study: Prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma
Leske, M. C. (1994) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180121046 · Cited by 685
Risk Factors for Open-angle Glaucoma
Leske, M. C. (1995) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070092031 · Cited by 683
Hypertension, Perfusion Pressure, and Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: A Population-Based Assessment
Tielsch, J. M. (1995) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100020100038 · Cited by 680
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
Self-citationThe prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese
Iwase, A., Suzuki, Y., Araie, M., Yamamoto, T., Abe, H., Shirato, S., Kuwayama, Y., Mishima, H. K., Shimizu, H., Tomita, G., et al. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029 · Cited by 872
Li, Z., He, Y., Keel, S., Meng, W., Chang, R. T., & He, M. (2018) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023 · Cited by 830
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos
Varma, R., Ying-Lai, M., Francis, B. A., Nguyen, B. B.-T., Deneen, J., Wilson, M. R., & Azen, S. P. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.025 · Cited by 483
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Quigley, H. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1819
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027759113
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence of Glaucoma in a Population-Based Study of Hispanic Subjects: Proyecto VER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.119.12.1819
- The paper
- Quigley, H. A. (2001). The Prevalence of Glaucoma in a Population-Based Study of Hispanic Subjects: Proyecto VER. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.12.1819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.