Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 685

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Barbados Eye Study: Prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma

Leske, M. Cristina·1994·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design of the Barbados Eye Study and report on the prevalence of open angle glaucoma (OAG) in a predominantly black study population. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Residents of Barbados, West Indies, identified from a simple random sample of Barbadian-born citizens 40 through 84 years old. DATA COLLECTION: Participants had a comprehensive study visit that included automated perimetry, applanation tonometry, and fundus photography; persons with specific examination findings, as well as a 10% sample of participants, were referred for an ophthalmologic examination and additional tests. OUTCOME: A diagnosis of OAG required both visual field and optic disc criteria for glaucoma damage after excluding other causes. RESULTS: The 4709 participants (83.5% of those eligible) had demographic characteristics that were similar to the census population. Of the 4631 participants who were tested at the study site, 95% completed Humphrey automated perimetry and 97% had photographic or clinical disc gradings; 93% of those referred completed the ophthalmologic examination. In this adult population, the prevalence of OAG by self-reported race was 7.0% (302/4314) in black, 3.3% (6/184) in mixed-race, and 0.8% (1/133) in white or other participants. In black and mixed-race participants, the prevalence reached 12% at age 60 years and older and was higher in men (8.3%) than in women (5.7%), with an age-adjusted male-female ratio of 1.4. In addition, over 3% of the participants were classified as having suspect OAG. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the Barbados Eye Study is the largest glaucoma study ever conducted in a black population and identified more people with OAG than did any previous population study. The prevalence of OAG was high, especially at older ages and in men. Among participants 50 years old or older, one in 11 had OAG, and prevalence increased to one in six at age 70 years or older. The results highlight the public health importance of OAG in the Afro-Caribbean region and have implications for other populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180121046

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 685

Metadata

Authors
Leske, M. C.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1994-06-01
Volume
112
Issue
6
Pages
821
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123977931
Cited by
685
References
2
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Barbados Eye Study: Prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180121046
The paper
Leske, M. C. (1994). The Barbados Eye Study: Prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180121046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.