The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Initial Clinical Characteristics of Graves' Orbitopathy Vary With Age and Sex
Abstract
A better understanding of the clinical nature of Graves' orbitopathy will aid in the treatment of the disease as well as help to form a basis for clinical and pathophysiologic investigations. We studied the clinical data of 557 consecutive patients who were referred for treatment of Graves' orbitopathy. Clinical indexes were calculated based on ophthalmologic variables measured, grouped in the following categories: soft tissue, proptosis, muscle limitation, increase in intraocular pressure on upgaze, corneal staining, and visual acuity. The mean age at onset of orbital disease was 43.9 years for men and 44.4 years for women, an average of 2.5 years from the onset of thyroid disease. The male-female ratio was 0.29 in all age groups. Women were more likely to present with orbitopathy and hypothyroidism than were men (20% vs 11%) and less likely to be euthyroid (16% vs 34%, P < .01). Patients older than 50 years, compared with their younger counterparts, more often had symptoms of impaired ocular motility (32% vs 12%), signs of soft-tissue involvement (77.5% vs 68.6%), asymmetric soft-tissue involvement (15.6% vs 7.8%), more limited upward duction (22.2 degrees vs 29.4 degrees), and more impaired LogMAR visual acuity (0.092 vs 0.047, P < .01). Men had more limited upward duction than women (24.6 degrees vs 27.1 degrees) and greater increases in intraocular pressure on upgaze (7.80 mm Hg vs 5.78 mm Hg, P < .001). These data show thyroid orbitopathy to be a disease most common in younger women, but more severe, by most indexes, in men and patients older than 50 years. These groups of patients are also more likely to have asymmetric or euthyroid disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endocrine Ophthalmopathy: Current Ideas Concerning Etiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment
JACOBSON, D. H., & GORMAN, C. A. (1984) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-5-2-200 · Cited by 211
Cited by
Management of Graves’ Ophthalmopathy: Reality and Perspectives*
Bartalena, L., Pinchera, A., & Marcocci, C. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.2.0393 · Cited by 677
Autoimmune Thyroid Disease: Further Developments in Our Understanding*
WEETMAN, A. P., & McGREGOR, A. M. (1994) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-15-6-788 · Cited by 658
Diagnostic Criteria for Graves' Ophthalmopathy
BARTLEY, G. B., & GORMAN, C. A. (1995) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72787-4 · Cited by 477
Epidemiology of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) and relationship with thyroid disease
Lazarus, J. H. (2012) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2011.10.005 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendler, D. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-02-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167871793
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Initial Clinical Characteristics of Graves' Orbitopathy Vary With Age and Sex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090020051022
- The paper
- Kendler, D. L. (1993). The Initial Clinical Characteristics of Graves' Orbitopathy Vary With Age and Sex. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090020051022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.