Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Design and Baseline Description of the Participants

Open access
Gordon, Mae O.·1999·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical ocular hypotensive medication in preventing or delaying the onset of visual field loss and/or optic nerve damage in subjects with ocular hypertension at moderate risk for developing primary open angle glaucoma. OBJECTIVE: To describe the study protocol, the questions to be answered, and the baseline characteristics of the subjects. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized clinical trial with 2 groups: topical ocular hypotensive medication and close observation. SETTING: Subjects were enrolled and evaluated at 22 participating clinical centers. Visual fields and stereoscopic optic disc photographs were read in masked fashion. METHODS: We determined eligibility from a comprehensive eye examination, medical and ocular history, visual field testing, and stereoscopic optic disc photography. RESULTS: We describe the baseline characteristics of 1637 subjects randomized between February 28, 1994, and October 31, 1996. The mean age was 55 years; 56.9% of the subjects were women; and 25% were African American. The baseline intraocular pressure was 24.9 +/- 2.7 mm Hg (mean +/- SD). Systemic diseases and conditions reported by subjects included previous use of medication for ocular hypertension, 37%; systemic hypertension, 38%; cardiovascular disease, 6%; diabetes mellitus, 12%; and family history of glaucoma, 44%. The mean horizontal cup-disc ratio by contour estimated from stereophotography was 0.36 +/- 0.18. Qualifying Humphrey 30-2 visual fields had to be normal and reliable for entry into the study. Health-related quality of life (36-item short form health survey) scores in the OHTS sample were better than the age- and sex-matched population norms. African American subjects had larger baseline cup-disc ratios and higher reported rates of elevated blood pressure and diabetes than the rest of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The intraocular pressure among enrolled subjects was sufficiently high to provide an adequate test of the potential benefit of ocular hypotensive medication in preventing or delaying glaucomatous damage. The large number of African American subjects enrolled should provide a good estimate of the African American response to topical medication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.117.5.573

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, M. O.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
117
Issue
5
Pages
573
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973503527
Cited by
441
References
26
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Design and Baseline Description of the Participants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.117.5.573
The paper
Gordon, M. O. (1999). The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Design and Baseline Description of the Participants. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.117.5.573

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.