Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In Vivo Fundus Autofluorescence in Macular Dystrophies

von Rückmann, Andrea·1997·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the deviation from normal of fundus autofluorescence in patients with inherited macular dystrophies. METHODS: The intensity and spatial distribution of fundus autofluorescence was documented in 118 patients with inherited macular dystrophies by means of a confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope, and the images were compared with the fundus appearance and fluorescein angiograms. RESULTS: Background autofluorescence appears to be elevated in all forms of macular dystrophies examined. The pale deposits at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium in disorders such as Best disease, adult vitelliform macular dystrophy, and fundus flavimaculatus were consistently associated with higher levels of autofluorescence than the background signal. There was no strong correlation between the intensity of autofluorescence and the fluorescein angiographic sign of a dark choroid. Increased levels of autofluorescence were present in a subject with a mutation known to cause macular dystrophy but in whom there were no manifest ophthalmoscopic or functional abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: All dystrophies examined have in common accumulation of autofluorescent material in the retinal pigment epithelium to a greater degree than that seen with age. The abnormal high background autofluorescence associated with inherited macular dystrophies confirms the impression derived from histological studies that these disorders affect the entire retinal pigment epithelium. The lack of correlation between autofluorescence and the presence of a dark choroid implies that there may be different fluorophores in different disorders. The pale deposits at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch membrane seen in macular dystrophies have similar autofluorescence characteristics. This technique may be useful in detecting the abnormal phenotype in early disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150611006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
von Rückmann, A.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
115
Issue
5
Pages
609
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987083130
Cited by
218
References
0
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Fundus Autofluorescence in Macular Dystrophies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150611006
The paper
von Rückmann, A. (1997). In Vivo Fundus Autofluorescence in Macular Dystrophies. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150611006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.