The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo Fundus Autofluorescence in Macular Dystrophies
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To document the deviation from normal of fundus autofluorescence in patients with inherited macular dystrophies. METHODS: The intensity and spatial distribution of fundus autofluorescence was documented in 118 patients with inherited macular dystrophies by means of a confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope, and the images were compared with the fundus appearance and fluorescein angiograms. RESULTS: Background autofluorescence appears to be elevated in all forms of macular dystrophies examined. The pale deposits at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium in disorders such as Best disease, adult vitelliform macular dystrophy, and fundus flavimaculatus were consistently associated with higher levels of autofluorescence than the background signal. There was no strong correlation between the intensity of autofluorescence and the fluorescein angiographic sign of a dark choroid. Increased levels of autofluorescence were present in a subject with a mutation known to cause macular dystrophy but in whom there were no manifest ophthalmoscopic or functional abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: All dystrophies examined have in common accumulation of autofluorescent material in the retinal pigment epithelium to a greater degree than that seen with age. The abnormal high background autofluorescence associated with inherited macular dystrophies confirms the impression derived from histological studies that these disorders affect the entire retinal pigment epithelium. The lack of correlation between autofluorescence and the presence of a dark choroid implies that there may be different fluorophores in different disorders. The pale deposits at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch membrane seen in macular dystrophies have similar autofluorescence characteristics. This technique may be useful in detecting the abnormal phenotype in early disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RPE lipofuscin and its role in retinal pathobiology
Sparrow, J. R., & Boulton, M. (2005) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2005.01.007 · Cited by 644
Phenotypic Subtypes of Stargardt Macular Dystrophy–Fundus Flavimaculatus
Lois, N. (2001) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.119.3.359 · Cited by 334
Loss of synchronized retinal phagocytosis and age-related blindness in mice lacking αvβ5 integrin
Nandrot, E. F., Kim, Y., Brodie, S. E., Huang, X., Sheppard, D., & Finnemann, S. C. (2004) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20041447 · Cited by 319
Cremers, F. P. M., Lee, W., Collin, R. W. J., & Allikmets, R. (2020) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100861 · Cited by 315
Lorenz, B., Wabbels, B., Wegscheider, E., Hamel, C. P., Drexler, W., & Preising, M. N. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.033 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- von Rückmann, A.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 609
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987083130
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Fundus Autofluorescence in Macular Dystrophies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150611006
- The paper
- von Rückmann, A. (1997). In Vivo Fundus Autofluorescence in Macular Dystrophies. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150611006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.