The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk Factors for Choroidal Neovascularization in the Second Eye of Patients With Juxtafoveal or Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To verify and quantify previously reported risk factors for development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the fellow eye of patients with 1 eye affected with CNV secondary to age-related macular degeneration, to examine the value of characteristics of the pericentral macula in the quantification of risk for developing CNV, and to explore whether the presence of occult CNV in the first eye affects the development of CNV in the fellow eye. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND SETTING: Follow-up study of fellow eyes of 670 patients enrolled in multicenter, randomized clinical trials of laser photocoagulation of juxtafoveal or subfoveal CNV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Development of CNV. RESULTS: Three characteristics of the central macula of the fellow eye and 1 systemic factor were associated independently with an increased risk of developing CNV: the presence of 5 or more drusen (relative risk, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.5), focal hyperpigmentation (relative risk, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.9), 1 or more large drusen (relative risk, 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.2), and definite systemic hypertension (relative risk, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.4). Estimated 5-year incidence rates ranged from 7% for the subgroup with no risk factors to 87% for the subgroup with all 4 risk factors. Characteristics of the pericentral macula were not strongly associated with the development of CNV. The presence of occult CNV in the first eye affected had no influence on the development of CNV or on the type of CNV in the fellow eye. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of the fellow eye is affected strongly by characteristics of its central macula and by systemic hypertension. These factors should be considered when counseling patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration and when targeting patients for preventive interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Age-related macular degeneration
Jager, R. D., Mieler, W. F., & Miller, J. W. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0801537 · Cited by 1,379
Hageman, G. (2001) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00010-6 · Cited by 1,265
Age-related macular degeneration: etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies
Ambati, J., Ambati, B. K., Yoo, S. H., Ianchulev, S., & Adamis, A. P. (2003) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(03)00030-4 · Cited by 959
A Simplified Severity Scale for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: AREDS Report No. 18
(2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.11.1570 · Cited by 807
(2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.11.1484 · Cited by 739
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-06-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 741
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2609124342
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors for Choroidal Neovascularization in the Second Eye of Patients With Juxtafoveal or Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150743009
- The paper
- Risk Factors for Choroidal Neovascularization in the Second Eye of Patients With Juxtafoveal or Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration. (1997). Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150743009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.